The Kaiser Method: A Theory of Constraints Case Study in Continuous Improvement
The remarkable transformation of Liberty Ship construction during World War II, driven by industrialist Henry J. Kaiser, serves as a powerful, real-world case study in the Theory of Constraints (). TOC, developed by Dr. Eliyahu M. Goldratt, posits that every complex system has at least one constraint (a bottleneck) that limits its overall output (throughput).
The Original Constraint: Time and Craftsmanship
The initial problem facing the Allies was a catastrophic throughput deficit: German U-boats were sinking ships faster than they could be built. Traditional shipbuilding was a sequential process, relying on highly skilled tradesmen, manual riveting, and assembly of the entire vessel on the slipway.
Original Constraint (230 Days): Sequential Assembly and Skilled Labor Availability.
Kaiser's Core Innovation (Elevating the Constraint): Kaiser and his chief engineer, Clay Bedford, redefined the ship as a product of mass production. They substituted sequential, skilled labor with modular construction and welding. They introduced an "assembly line" concept where different ship sections were built in parallel, and unskilled workers were quickly trained for single, repeatable tasks.
This radical shift elevated the initial constraints, slashing the average build time from an estimated 230 days to a 197-day record, and quickly down to an average of 42 days.
Phase II: The First Iteration of TOC (42 Days → 21 Days)
Once the original labor and process constraints were resolved, the bottleneck immediately shifted to the next limiting factor. For any high-throughput manufacturing operation, the constraint invariably moves to the space where the final product is constructed.
New Constraint Identified (Step 1): The Final Assembly Ways (The Slip). Only one hull could occupy the slipway at a time for final hull welding and launch. This dictated the maximum output rate.
Exploit & Subordinate (Steps 2 & 3): To maximize the ways, work was strictly controlled. Rework was moved off the slipway, and a Drum-Buffer-Rope () system was implicitly used: the ways set the "Drum" pace, and pre-fabricated modules formed the protective "Buffer."
Elevation for 50% Reduction (Step 4): To meet the ambitious goal of a 21-day cycle, the only viable solution was to physically replicate the bottleneck. By doubling the number of Final Assembly Ways (adding a twin slip), the yard instantly doubled its capacity for final assembly, theoretically cutting the throughput time in half.
Phase III: The Second Iteration of TOC (21 Days → 10 Days)
According to TOC's fifth step, "Don't let inertia set in; go back to step one." Once the Final Assembly Ways were no longer the constraint, the bottleneck migrated backward in the process flow.
New Constraint Identified (Step 1): Pre-Fabrication Shop Throughput. The shops that built the massive modular sections (engine rooms, deckhouses) now struggled to feed the dual final assembly lines fast enough. Their limits were space, crane availability, and complex welding/fitting time.
Exploit & Subordinate (Steps 2 & 3): Shops would enforce Total Quality Management () and Standardization to avoid costly rework later. The Buffer of ready-to-cut steel was placed before these shops to ensure they never ran idle. Dedicated, Just-in-Time () transportation was instituted to subordinate logistics to the shops' output schedule.
Elevation for 10-Day Goal (Step 4): Achieving a 10-day cycle demanded massive elevation through parallelization:
Parallel Sub-Modularization: Breaking complex modules (like the engine room) into three sub-assembly sections to be built simultaneously in parallel bays.
Infrastructure Replication: Building a parallel Pre-Fabrication facility dedicated to the highest-volume modules, thereby doubling the floor space and crane capacity in the shops.
By applying TOC repeatedly—identifying the constraint, maximizing its use, aligning the rest of the system to its pace, and finally elevating its capacity—Kaiser's yard demonstrated how continuous improvement can fundamentally change the physics of production, transforming a months-long process into a matter of days.
Summary of Liberty Ship Case Study Points:
Original Problem: Traditional shipbuilding took 6–8 months (up to 230 days), falling behind the rate of German U-boat attacks.
Core Innovation: Henry J. Kaiser and Clay Bedford applied mass production techniques (like Ford's assembly line) to shipbuilding.
Key Process Changes: Welding replaced riveting, and Modular Construction allowed separate sections (bow, stern, engine room) to be built in parallel.
Workforce: Recruited and trained thousands of inexperienced workers to perform one specific, simple task.
Results Timeline:
First ship: 197 days.
Spring 1942 average: 70 days.
Record time (SS Robert E. Peary): 4 days, 15 hours, 29 minutes.
National average by 1943: 42 days.
Legacy: The high output allowed the US to build three ships a day, surpassing German U-boat losses and proving a key factor in the war.
發表文章
