Smarter, Not Just Smaller: Holistic Solutions to Government Spending Inefficiency
The debate over government spending often simplifies into a binary choice: more spending or less spending. As our research has shown, the problem isn’t just the amount of money spent, but how it’s spent. The observation that government spending on goods and services is more expensive is well-documented, with studies pointing to a "factor of X" ranging from cost overruns on major projects to millions in wasted software licenses. The root causes, from Milton Friedman’s "spending other people’s money on others" to bureaucratic “red tape,” highlight a fundamental lack of incentive for efficiency. The question then becomes, will simply a "small government" solve the issue? The answer is no, not entirely.
The Incompleteness of the "Small Government" Argument
While reducing the size and scope of government can certainly eliminate some areas of waste, it is an incomplete solution. A small government, by its nature, can also underinvest in essential public goods like infrastructure, education, and national defense, which have a high rate of return for the economy and society. The core issue is systemic, not merely one of scale. Even a small government can suffer from the same bureaucratic inefficiencies, lack of competition in bidding, and political interference that plague larger ones.
The real solution lies not in making government smaller, but in making it smarter. This requires a holistic approach that targets the root causes of inefficiency, regardless of a government’s size or political structure.
Universal Solutions for All Governments
These solutions address the fundamental breakdowns in a government's procurement and management processes and can be applied in both democratic and authoritative systems.
Data-Driven Transparency and Accountability: The key to solving the problem of misaligned incentives is shining a light on the process. Implementing open contracting data standards allows for public tracking of every stage of a procurement contract, from bidding to completion.
1 This level of transparency makes it easier to spot price gouging and collusion, forcing actors to act more ethically. Chile’s experience with open procurement, which led to a 28% reduction in IT costs, is a testament to this approach.Modernizing Bureaucracy and Talent: Government inefficiency often stems from outdated, rigid processes and a "brain drain" of skilled talent to the private sector.
2 Streamline Processes: Reduce the layers of approval and "red tape" that stall projects and inflate costs.
3 Adopt agile, modular approaches for technology and infrastructure projects to deliver value in smaller, more efficient increments.4 Cultivate Expertise: Invest in training and professional development for public servants, particularly in procurement and project management. Offer competitive compensation and career paths that reward efficiency and innovation, not just seniority.
Performance-Based Contracts: Move away from fixed-price contracts that reward completion regardless of quality. Instead, use contracts that tie payments to measurable performance outcomes and key performance indicators (KPIs), creating a shared incentive for success.
5
Tailored Solutions for Different Government Types
While the above solutions apply universally, the path to implementing them differs greatly.
For Democratic Governments
Democratic systems, with their emphasis on checks and balances, should leverage these strengths to combat waste.
Legislative and Regulatory Reform: Pass laws that simplify and modernize the procurement process, making it less vulnerable to lobbying and special interests (addressing the public choice theory).
6 Establish independent, non-partisan oversight bodies with the authority to audit and investigate spending.Empowering Citizen Oversight: Foster a culture where government is held accountable by the public. Support investigative journalism, watchdog organizations, and open data initiatives that allow citizens to become part of the oversight process.
Strategic Use of Public-Private Partnerships (P3s): P3s are not a magic bullet, but when used with a rigorous Value for Money (VfM) analysis, they can transfer risk and leverage private sector expertise.
7 The public sector's role shifts from a direct builder to a smart partner, focused on securing the best overall value, not just the lowest initial cost.
For Authoritarian Governments
In systems where public or legislative oversight is limited, the impetus for change must come from the top down.
Centralized Accountability and Anti-Corruption: Create a powerful, centralized anti-corruption agency with a direct line of authority to the highest levels of government. This body must have the power to investigate and prosecute officials who engage in corrupt or wasteful spending, with the full backing of the state.
Mandated Efficiency Metrics: Implement mandatory performance metrics for all government agencies. Leaders should be held accountable for meeting specific, quantifiable efficiency goals, with rewards and punishments tied directly to outcomes. This creates an internal incentive for efficiency that can work even without external oversight.
Limited Openness as a Control Mechanism: While full democratic transparency may not be an option, a government can implement limited open contracting as an internal control mechanism. By making a portion of procurement data available, the central government can monitor for fraud and waste among lower-level officials without ceding full control.
The problem of government spending inefficiency is not a simple one with a simple solution. It is a complex issue rooted in misaligned incentives and systemic failures. While a small government may be a political ideal for some, the practical solution lies in building a smarter government. By combining universal principles of transparency and modernization with tailored, system-specific solutions, it is possible to transform public spending from a source of waste into a powerful engine for national progress and value.
發表文章
