2025年3月1日 星期六

勿輕信及時行樂

 手機之禍,首及寒門子弟。彼輩既無顯赫之門第,又不思進取,既無倚靠之山,又不肯奮力。終日執手機於手,虛擲光陰於虛擬遊戲,浪費青春於鄙俗劇情。

子可知乎?凡唾手可得之樂,皆暗標其價。少時之放縱懶惰,換來者乃長大後之悔恨莫及。

人生至悲,莫過於學時未歷真生活,嘗盡生活之苦,欲回首再學,已失良機。

今之手機,非僅聯絡情誼之具,方寸屏幕,早主宰人之喜怒哀樂。

尤以青少年為甚,若陷手機之阱,彼等於遊戲、視頻之爽感中,漸失情緒之控,及深度學習之能。

馬斯克曾警言:「短視頻算法,噬子之腦。」

此非危言聳聽,乃不爭之實。嘗有研究指出,常人之腦與沉迷電子產品者之腦,結構迥異。前者紋路清晰,表面光滑,後者則紋路紊亂,甚或萎縮。

子當明瞭,玩手機乃欲望,非需求。

需求既滿則消,欲望則不然,其無止境。玩手機一小時,復欲再玩一小時,若不自制,恐終身沉淪。

手機可為連接世界之橋梁,拓寬知識之窗口,亦可為毀滅人生之毒藥,使人無限沉淪,虛度一生。

自律之子,奮力向上攀登,不自律者,則深陷垃圾快樂,難以翻身。

沉迷遊戲之青少年,將為人生賽道上首批淘汰者,放不下手機者,亦註定難以肩負生活之重。

歌德有言:「誰若遊戲人生,則一事無成;誰不能主宰自己,便永遠是一個奴隸。」

吾輩多為無背景、乏資源之凡人,既無父母可拼,又無靠山可尋,若再渾渾噩噩,不力學,將來何以與人爭鋒?

生活無公平可言,唯強弱之分,強者大方擁有,弱者受盡委屈。

今不願花時創造所欲之生活,將來則必用一生應付所不欲之生活。

記住,未來之幸運,皆為當下努力之伏筆。時間公平,人皆一日二十四時,拉開人距者,乃對待時間之態度。

珍惜時間,生活方會眷顧。努力讀書,非為與人比成績,亦非為爭顏面,乃為未來前途與暮年歡喜。

黑髮不知勤學早,白首方悔讀書遲。勿於當努力之年紀,選擇安逸。人生至痛,非我不行,乃我本可以。

嘗有校長言:「世界之大,皆欲一覽,汝分數之少,寸步難行。數學,買菜用不到,然可決定汝於何處買菜。」

勿輕信及時行樂,否則後果唯有失敗。遊戲失敗,尚可重來,人生失敗,則只剩追悔。讀書雖難,不讀書,則難上加難。父母非永恆依靠,人生風雨,終須自扛。

 


Scene: Mr. Lee's office. Again, slightly cluttered but familiar.

Characters:

  • Mr. Lee (Owner): 60s, pragmatic, deeply invested in his family's restaurant chain, battling rising costs, skeptical of new ideas that might impact the bottom line.

  • David (Training Manager): 30s, enthusiastic, sees the potential to improve customer service and employee well-being, but understands he needs to convince Mr. Lee with data and empathy.

(David knocks gently on the door. Mr. Lee, hunched over a spreadsheet, grunts a "Come in.")

David: Thanks for seeing me, Mr. Lee. I know you're busy. I wanted to talk to you about something that I think could really help us improve… not just our customer experience, but also our bottom line in the long run.

Mr. Lee: (Sighs, pushes the spreadsheet aside) "Improve our bottom line"? Always with the long run... David, we need to worry about this quarter's bottom line. Food costs are killing us, energy bills are insane, and minimum wage keeps going up. Every new idea seems to cost more money.

David: I understand those pressures, Mr. Lee, and I wouldn't be coming to you if I didn't genuinely believe this would help. It's about how we're managing our staff during peak hours, especially the dinner rush.

(Layer 1: Unclear on the "Why" - What to change? )

Mr. Lee: What's wrong with our staffing? We run a tight ship. I see those kids working hard every night. They're not standing around gossiping, that's for sure.

David: I agree, they are working hard, Mr. Lee, maybe too hard. That's the problem. I've noticed the stress levels are really high, and I'm starting to see the effects ripple through the whole operation.

Mr. Lee: Stress? They're young. A little hard work never hurt anyone. When I started, I was working 18 hours a day!

David: I know, Mr. Lee, and I respect that work ethic. But it’s showing: increased mistakes in orders, longer wait times, and I've had a few servers tell me they're just too rushed to give customers the personal attention they deserve. This effects tips as well. I saw on yelp some people said the food was bland! But can you blame them? It must be hard when the workload is so extreme!

Mr. Lee: (Frowning) Yikes! That's not good. Our reputation is built on quality and service. Those reviews affect us... I see. So what are you saying? Hire more people? We can't afford it!

(Layer 2: Unclear on the Solution - What to change to? )

David: It's about more people, yes, but not necessarily hiring new staff right away. It's about strategically staffing with 20-25% more capacity than we think we need, especially during those peak dinner rushes. Think of it as "protective capacity."

Mr. Lee: "Protective capacity?" Sounds like a fancy term for being overstaffed and wasteful! I need efficient. Wasteful is the opposite.

David: It might sound that way, but it's based on sound principles and evidence. Have you heard about the formula throughput= inventory flow / cycle time. It helps show throughput with numbers what is happening in the restaurant. By following, we can make the best decision.

Mr. Lee: Okay, what is this magic formula? Numbers don't lie. What number can it show? And what about the cost?

David: I know it sounds too good, but let me explain. There is one scientist names Little that discovered the magic formula, and they also have something called queueing theory.

Mr. Lee: This sounds too theoretical, do you know how much work I did for the restaurant? And you can tell me so that I can change it?

David: Mr. Lee, I have no intention to teach you that stuff. But just keep it in mind. In short, imagine we do not add people to the team. Then everyone will be stressed and we cannot have what we need. We need balance to make the profits balance, so it is fair for everyone.

(Layer 3: Lack of Trust - Will this work? )

Mr. Lee: You know what, I am here now. I am walking. How about that?

David: That is a great point. But if there were more people, there would be more opportunities. With you or me not having to worry about the day to day, more ideas to innovate.

David: Mr. Lee, I know what you mean, It might sound too theoretical so how about we do this: We take your daughter who is now working on the website, and we have her write on one side about how the extra space improved. But you write the other side to share with everyone about how hard it is and why we could not.

Mr. Lee: You would not be mad right?

David: No!

Mr. Lee: Fine, But no complaining!

David: Fine too!

(Layer 4: Fear of the Unknown - What if something goes wrong? )

Mr. Lee: Look, I'm worried. What if we have a slow night? What if the economy tanks again? Then I'm stuck with all these extra people, costing me money.

David: I hear you, Mr. Lee. We wouldn't be adding staff blindly. We'd be closely monitoring sales, customer traffic, and labor costs. And there will also be no waste. I am not suggesting for us to be dumb and add team members.

David: We can:

  • Take courses

  • Team Building

  • Learn to market on Instagram!

  • Better Food

Mr. Lee: So the money is spent at the end? That is not right.

(Layer 5: Overcoming Obstacles - How do we make this happen? )

David: Not at all. I will teach those other guys on the clock all that I know. I already teach them everything I know. But I can share it with all of you, so everyone can know. That way, not only are we efficient, but we are strong.

Mr. Lee: With this money... so much trouble...

David: We can take it slow. And we start somewhere else so it has less problems. I know you care a lot, but so do I.

Mr. Lee: Well, I guess it depends on you.

(Layer 6: "Egolessness" - Even if successful, how will I personally benefit? )

David: What about you? With more flexibility on the table, what are your thoughts?

Mr. Lee: Well with you guys, I would get to have more rest. I get to relax and not worry about my team. I can leave everything to you guys and relax.

David: Yes!

Mr. Lee: If that happens, that happens.

David: And with your guidance and direction, it is important.

Mr. Lee: Are you trying to butter me up?

David: (Smiles)

Mr. Lee: You, get this done. I'm tired of being a workaholic, but if everything falls down, you are working for free!

David: (Extends hand for handshake) Deal. I'm confident we can make this work, Mr. Lee. And even if we fail the first time, this lesson will help us.