Navigating the Turning Tides: The Liu Family's Shanghai Dilemma
Shanghai, a city synonymous with dynamism and prosperity, became a stage for wrenching personal decisions as war and revolution swept through China. For affluent families like the Lius, the question of whether to remain rooted in their established lives or to embark on a perilous flight into the unknown presented a profound and recurring dilemma. Their experiences, meticulously documented in The Lius of Shanghai by Sherman Cochran and Andrew Hsieh, offer a poignant insight into the heartbreak and complex considerations that underpinned these critical choices during the Sino-Japanese War and the subsequent Communist Revolution.
The Sino-Japanese War (1937-1945) thrust the Liu family into an initial crisis that unexpectedly forced separation. Following the Japanese invasion, the father and some of his children were compelled to flee Shanghai, leaving the mother and others behind. This involuntary dispersal immediately highlighted the brutal realities of war and the potential for families to be torn apart by external forces.
As the occupation settled in, a significant internal debate arose regarding how to navigate life under Japanese rule. The pragmatic Third Son, as revealed in The Lius of Shanghai, argued for a degree of cooperation with the Japanese in Shanghai's business sector, viewing it as a necessary adaptation regardless of the eventual victor. He believed that resisting entirely could lead to missed opportunities for the family's enterprises. This perspective contrasted with the unspoken anxieties of aligning with an occupying force and the potential long-term repercussions. Throughout this period, maintaining familial bonds across the divides created by the war remained a central, albeit challenging, concern for the Lius.
The Communist Revolution of 1949 presented a new and perhaps even more complex set of choices for the Liu family. The looming prospect of Communist rule ignited fears among many of Shanghai's elite, mirroring the broader anxieties described in Helen Zia's Last Boat Out of Shanghai, where the middle and wealthy classes foresaw an inversion of the social order that had long benefited them.
Within the Liu family, differing viewpoints emerged regarding the best course of action. Sixth Son, secretly a member of the Communist Party, passionately advocated for the entire family to remain in Shanghai and embrace the new political landscape. He even brought a fellow party member to a family meeting to articulate the Communist Party's policies, offering assurances of safety and the protection of their factories. This perspective emphasized potential continuity and the possibility of adapting to the new regime.
However, the father harboured significant reservations. As detailed in The Lius of Shanghai, he initially considered a hedging strategy, proposing to relocate part of the family and their business interests to the British colony of Hong Kong while leaving a portion behind in Shanghai. This reflected a deep-seated uncertainty about the future under Communist control and a desire to safeguard the family's assets and future prospects. Eighth Son, studying in the United States, voiced strong doubts about returning to a Communist-ruled China, questioning his future employment opportunities and even contemplating alternative destinations like Taiwan or Hong Kong.
The decision-making process was far from straightforward and deeply intertwined with personal circumstances and familial pressures. The father, for instance, found himself under scrutiny from Nationalist officials suspicious of his reluctance to flee to Taiwan. The pressure culminated in a forced flight to Guangzhou shortly before the Communist takeover of Shanghai, from where he eventually made his way to Hong Kong. Despite this seemingly involuntary departure, earlier correspondence suggested he had been making preparations to leave for Hong Kong, indicating a level of pre-planning amidst the chaos.
While in Hong Kong, the father was constantly implored by his children remaining in Shanghai to return home. Second Son, particularly, played a crucial role, reporting that Shanghai had weathered the Communist takeover with surprisingly little damage and emphasizing the well-disciplined nature of the People's Liberation Army compared to the retreating Nationalists. The pull of family and the location of their extensive business enterprises in Shanghai ultimately proved decisive for the father. He eventually returned to Shanghai in November 1949, abandoning the initial strategy of dispersal. As chronicled in The Lius of Shanghai, his rationale for returning shifted from personal and pragmatic concerns, such as his age and the location of his businesses, to a public endorsement of the new government's policies.
The consequences of these choices were varied and long-lasting. While the father and several sons ultimately returned to Shanghai, others, like Fifth and Seventh Sons, remained in Taiwan. Eighth Son's journey involved a temporary return before settling back in Hong Kong, illustrating the enduring uncertainty and the difficulty of making a final commitment. For those who stayed in mainland China, a new chapter unfolded under Communist rule, bringing both challenges and, for a time, even unexpected benefits for the Liu family's business, as detailed in The Lius of Shanghai. The decisions made during these tumultuous periods indelibly shaped the trajectory of the Liu family, reflecting the profound human cost and complex realities of a nation undergoing radical transformation.
A: Secure the long-term well-being and prosperity of the Liu family and its business. (Family unity is implied as part of well-being.)B: Must Centralize the Family & Business in Shanghai (Embrace Communist Rule)C: Must Decentralize the Family & Business (Diversify Risk & Location)D: Able to Secure Liu Family's FutureD': Unable to Secure Liu Family's Future
A --> B (Secure Liu Family's Future implies Must Centralize in Shanghai): Assumption 1 (Sixth Son): The Communist Party will uphold its promises and protect the Liu family and their business. (Based on trust in the Party and belief in its ideology.)Assumption 2 (Second Son): Shanghai will remain stable and prosperous under Communist rule. (Based on his firsthand observations immediately after the takeover.)Assumption 3 (The Father, ultimately): Family unity and the presence of the existing business outweigh the risks of remaining in Shanghai. (Based on his desire to be near his family and the difficulty of relocating the entire business).Assumption 4 (The Father, ultimately): Central control is key to the business success, which requires the father to be near.
A --> C (Secure Liu Family's Future implies Must Decentralize): Assumption 1 (The Father, initially): "Don't put all your eggs in one basket" - diversifying locations will mitigate risk in an uncertain political climate. (Based on a pragmatic risk management approach.)Assumption 2 (Eighth Son): China's economic and political future under Communism is bleak; seeking opportunities elsewhere is essential. (Based on his observations in the US and skepticism about the new regime.)Assumption 3 (Business Associates in Hong Kong): Opportunities for business and growth are better in Hong Kong than in Communist China. (Based on a belief in free-market capitalism and skepticism about Communist economic policies.)Assumption 4 (Eldest Son): Opportunities for the younger generations are better overseas.
B --> D (Centralize in Shanghai implies Able to Secure Liu Family's Future): Assumption 1: The Communist government will allow the Liu family to retain control of their business and generate profits. (Contradicted by later events.)Assumption 2: The Liu family will be able to adapt to the new political and economic environment. (Difficult to guarantee).Assumption 3: There will be a stable economy in Shanghai under the communist government.
C --> D' (Decentralize implies Unable to Secure Liu Family's Future): Assumption 1: Decentralization will lead to a loss of control over the business and a decline in profitability. (Potentially true if not managed well.)Assumption 2: Family members who relocate will struggle to find opportunities and maintain connections with each other. (The assumption of family unity is being threatened)Assumption 3: It would be difficult for overseas expansion to compete with the Communist's business.
Establish a Clear Family Charter/Agreement: A formal agreement outlining the shared values, goals, and responsibilities of the Liu family, regardless of location. This would address:Financial Obligations: How profits will be shared and used to support family members. Communication Protocols: How family members will stay connected and informed. Decision-Making Processes: How major decisions affecting the family will be made, even with members in different locations. Succession Planning: How the business will be passed on to future generations.
Grant Greater Autonomy to Individual Family Members: Encourage individual sons to pursue their own opportunities and make their own decisions, within the framework of the family charter. This means allowing the Eighth Son to remain in the US, the Fifth and Seventh Sons to stay in Taiwan, and the Sixth Son to pursue his Communist ideals, all while maintaining their connection to the family.Facilitate Flexible Resource Allocation: Create a system for allocating family resources (capital, expertise, networks) to support individual ventures, regardless of location. This might involve setting up a family investment fund or providing mentorship and guidance to family members.Contingency Planning for Different Scenarios: Develop contingency plans for various scenarios that could arise in Shanghai and other locations, such as nationalization, economic hardship, or political instability. This could involve setting up emergency funds, establishing backup supply chains, or diversifying business operations.Establish routine communication between family members, regardless of geographical location: Communication enables the family to be aligned.
Weakens the B --> D and C --> D' connections: It reduces the perceived certainty that either centralizing or decentralizing will guarantee a positive outcome.Strengthens the "A" Value (Family Well-being): It shifts the focus from a geographical or political strategy to the underlying goal of family unity and prosperity.Empowers Individual Agency: It allows individual family members to make their own choices and pursue their own opportunities, while still maintaining their connection to the family.
發表文章
