如何終結倉庫混亂並準時發貨

 

清除瓶頸：如何終結倉庫混亂並準時發貨

在繁忙的物流與配送世界中，有一個經常出現混亂的點：出貨碼頭。這是將已完成的貨物裝載到卡車上進行運送的地方。一個常見的現實問題是這個區域超載。卡車排隊等候，承運商延遲，而倉促的、最後一刻的趕工成了常態。這個「瓶頸」阻礙了準時交貨並損害了客戶服務。

這種情況是**約束理論（Theory of Constraints, TOC）**的完美應用，這是一種管理哲學，專注於識別和管理任何系統中單一最大的瓶頸。通過應用 TOC 的原則，配送中心（DC）可以將其營運從混亂轉變為順暢、高效的流程。

---

問題：裝貨碼頭的瓶頸

將配送中心想像成一條產品流向單一出口的河流：裝貨碼頭。如果碼頭太小或太慢，它就像一道水壩。已打包好的棧板和貨物開始堆積在它後面。

• 承運商延誤： 預定取貨的卡車被迫等待，導致時間浪費和承運商不滿。這可能會導致配送中心受到罰款。

• 最後一刻的混亂： 隨著卡車出發期限的臨近，工人爭相尋找放錯位置的文件、完成打包並裝載卡車，導致錯誤和貨物損壞風險增加。

• 糟糕的客戶服務： 所有這些延誤最終都會影響到終端客戶，他們無法準時收到訂單。

---

TOC 療法：平穩、受控的流程

TOC 提供了一個結構化的三步解決方案，其核心思想是鼓-緩衝-繩（Drum-Buffer-Rope, DBR）。

1. 將碼頭作為鼓（The Drum）：

   在 DBR 系統中，「鼓」是約束——是決定所有其他事物節奏的系統部分。在這裡，出貨碼頭的處理能力就是鼓。不要讓倉庫的所有部分獨立運作，而是讓整個營運的節奏由碼頭能處理多少貨物來決定。解決方案是根據碼頭的能力安排裝載。如果碼頭每小時只能處理 10 輛卡車，您就不會安排 15 輛。這個簡單的改變從一開始就防止了碼頭超載。

2. 在上游預先準備（緩衝，The Buffer）：

   「緩衝」是在鼓前面的一種戰略性工作庫存。它的目的是確保鼓永遠不會因上游的小中斷而沒有工作。對於裝貨碼頭來說，緩衝至關重要。解決方案是在上游預先準備好已下單的棧板和文件。與其等到卡車到達後才收集和整理所有東西，不如事先將棧板撿貨、打包並移動到碼頭附近的指定暫存區。文件也提前準備和歸檔，隨時待命。這確保一旦碼頭的一個裝載口空出來，下一批貨物就準備就緒並等候，從而消除了最後一刻的混亂。

3. 服從鼓的節奏（繩，The Rope）：

   「繩」是最後一個環節。它是將其他營運的節奏與鼓聯繫起來的信號。這意味著您要調整撿貨和打包班次，使其與碼頭的週期同步。不要整天撿貨並讓它們在碼頭堆積，而是安排撿貨和打包在準時的時間點，將貨物送入預備區以進行裝載。這防止了庫存堆積，並使整個倉庫能夠以協調、有節奏的方式運作。

---

結果：準時出發

通過實施這些 TOC 原則，配送中心可以實現顯著的成果。他們不再試圖趕工，而是專注於受控、高效的流程。這種有針對性的方法避免了常見的最後一刻混亂，顯著提高了準時出貨率，並提升了承運商和客戶滿意度。配送中心不再是堆滿貨物的混亂之地，而是一個運作良好的機器，每個動作都與營運中最重要的部分——裝貨碼頭——的節奏同步。

Clearing the Choke Point: How to End Warehouse Chaos and Ship On Time

 

Clearing the Choke Point: How to End Warehouse Chaos and Ship On Time

In the bustling world of logistics and distribution, there's a point of frequent chaos: the outbound dock. This is where finished shipments are loaded onto trucks for delivery. A common real-world problem is that this area gets overloaded. Trucks stack up, carriers are delayed, and a frantic, last-minute rush becomes the norm. This "choke point" prevents timely deliveries and hurts customer service.

This scenario is a perfect application of the Theory of Constraints (TOC), a management philosophy that focuses on identifying and managing the single biggest bottleneck in any system. By applying TOC's principles, a distribution center (DC) can transform its operations from a chaotic mess into a smooth, efficient process.

The Problem: A Bottleneck at the Loading Dock

Think of a distribution center as a river of products flowing toward a single exit: the loading dock. If the dock is too small or too slow, it acts like a dam. Products, now in the form of packed pallets and shipments, begin to pile up behind it.

• Carrier Delays: Trucks scheduled for pickup are forced to wait, leading to wasted time and frustrated carriers. This can result in financial penalties for the DC.

• Last-Minute Chaos: As the deadline for a truck's departure approaches, workers rush to find misplaced documents, finish packing, and load the truck, leading to mistakes and increased risk of damage.

• Poor Customer Service: All of these delays ultimately affect the end customer, who doesn't receive their order on time.

The TOC Cure: A Smooth, Controlled Flow

TOC offers a structured, three-step solution to this problem, centered on the idea of Drum-Buffer-Rope (DBR).

1. Make the Dock the Drum:

   In a DBR system, the "Drum" is the constraint—the part of the system that dictates the pace for everything else. Here, the outbound dock's capacity is the Drum. Instead of letting all parts of the warehouse operate independently, the entire operation's pace is set by how much the dock can handle. The cure is to schedule loads around the dock's capacity. If the dock can only handle 10 trucks an hour, you don't schedule 15. This simple change prevents the dock from being overwhelmed in the first place.

2. Pre-Stage Upstream (Buffer):

   A "Buffer" is a strategic inventory of work in front of the Drum. Its purpose is to ensure the Drum is never starved for work, even if there are small disruptions upstream. For a loading dock, the buffer is crucial. The cure is to pre-stage ordered pallets and documents upstream. Instead of waiting until a truck arrives to collect and organize everything, pallets are picked, packed, and moved to a designated holding area near the dock beforehand. Documents are prepared and filed, ready to go. This ensures that as soon as a dock bay becomes free, the next shipment is ready and waiting, eliminating last-minute chaos.

3. Subordinate to the Drum's Rhythm:

   The "Rope" is the final piece. It's the signal that ties the pace of the rest of the operation to the Drum. This means you subordinate picking and packing shifts to align with the dock's cycles. Instead of picking products all day and letting them pile up at the dock, picking and packing are scheduled to feed the pre-staging area just-in-time for loading. This prevents inventory from stacking up and allows the entire warehouse to move in a coordinated, rhythmic flow.

The Result: On-Time Departures

By implementing these TOC principles, a distribution center can achieve remarkable results. They stop trying to rush and instead focus on a controlled, efficient flow. This targeted approach avoids the common last-minute chaos, dramatically improves on-time departures, and boosts carrier and customer satisfaction. The DC is no longer a chaotic mess of piled-up shipments but a well-oiled machine where every action is synchronized to the rhythm of the single most important part of the operation: the loading dock.

篩選存貨：如何杜絕醫藥庫存浪費並保護關鍵品項

 

篩選存貨：如何杜絕醫藥庫存浪費並保護關鍵品項

在醫藥界，庫存管理是一場高風險的遊戲。為了滿足市場需求，公司通常會持有大量不同的產品變體，即SKU（庫存單位）。然而，這種普遍做法導致了一個無聲但重大的問題：倉庫裡堆滿了慢銷品項，最終過期，迫使公司將其作為總損失註銷。同時，這種混亂會掩蓋供應鏈的真實狀況，導致關鍵的救命藥物庫存不足。

這個挑戰是**約束理論（Theory of Constraints, TOC）**的經典應用案例，它為我們提供了一條清晰的道路，來確定優先順序並保護最重要的東西。TOC 幫助我們區分什麼才是真正重要的，以及什麼只是佔用空間和花費金錢。

---

問題：兩種 SKU 的故事

想像一家擁有數千種不同產品變體的製藥公司。有些是每天數百萬人使用的暢銷藥，而另一些則是針對特定小眾患者群體的罕見藥物。如果沒有明智的策略，庫存系統會對兩者一視同仁。這導致了：

• 過度浪費： 低需求 SKU 在貨架上存放數月甚至數年，最終過期並被丟棄。這不僅是財務損失，也是浪費的主要來源。

• 患者風險： 公司的注意力被分散，最重要的、快銷藥物可能無法得到應有的關注。這可能導致救命藥物缺貨，其代價遠遠超過任何財務損失。

---

TOC 療法：簡單的三步處方

解決方案在於將 TOC 原則應用於庫存管理。這是一種戰略性做法，重點關注產出（throughput），即系統創造金錢的速度。

1. 根據產出對 SKU 進行排序：

   首先，我們必須停止將所有產品一視同仁。利用產出會計，我們不僅根據銷量，還根據每個 SKU 對公司產出的貢獻來對其進行排序。這意味著我們關注一個 SKU 產生的毛利潤，減去任何直接成本。更重要的是，我們也考慮其臨床價值。一種罕見的救命藥物，即使銷量很低，也具有極高的臨床產出。這一步讓我們對什麼是真正有價值的有了清晰的認識。

   數字範例：

   讓我們看看三個假設的 SKU：

   • SKU A（救命疫苗）： 每月銷售 100 單位，每單位利潤 500 美元。每月產出：50,000 美元。臨床價值： 極高。

   • SKU B（常用止痛藥）： 每月銷售 10,000 單位，每單位利潤 10 美元。每月產出：100,000 美元。臨床價值： 高。

   • SKU C（稀有膳食補充劑）： 每月銷售 20 單位，每單位利潤 20 美元。每月產出：400 美元。臨床價值： 低。

   產出會計立即凸顯出，雖然 SKU B 的銷量最高，但 SKU A 的關鍵性質和高單位價值使其同樣重要，甚至更值得保護。而 SKU C 的貢獻則微不足道。

2. 淘汰低績效品項：

   一旦對 SKU 進行排序，您會發現少數產品貢獻了絕大部分的產出。您還會發現一組對產出貢獻微乎其微的低影響 SKU。解決方法很簡單：通過淘汰這些非必需品來減少 SKU 數量。這釋放了原本浪費在這些幾乎沒有價值的品項上的資金、倉庫空間和管理注意力。

   數字範例：

   經過分析，公司決定停產 SKU C。通過這樣做，他們騰出了以前用於管理每月僅產生 400 美元產出的產品的空間和人力。這些資源現在可以轉向更有利可圖或更關鍵的產品。

3. 差異化緩衝庫存：

   隨著庫存的精簡，您現在可以對剩餘品項採用量身定制的管理方法。您不再採用一刀切的安全庫存水平，而是建立差異化的緩衝庫存。

   數字範例：

   假設所有產品的典型安全庫存為 2 個月的供應量。

   • SKU A（救命疫苗）： 我們將其緩衝庫存增加到4 個月的供應量，以防止任何中斷。我們現在維持 400 單位，而不是 200 單位，以確保患者永遠不會面臨缺貨風險。

   • SKU B（常用止痛藥）： 我們將其緩衝庫存保持在2 個月的供應量，這對於高需求、穩定的產品來說已經足夠。我們維持 20,000 單位。

   • SKU C（稀有膳食補充劑）： 由於我們已經將其從庫存中淘汰，因此其庫存供應量為 0 個月。

---

結果：更健康的庫存

通過應用這些 TOC 原則，製藥公司可以將其庫存從雜亂、浪費的混亂狀態，轉變為一個精簡、高效的系統。他們不再關注消耗資源的產品，而是開始保護那些拯救生命的產品。這種方法不僅降低了浪費和成本，更重要的是，保護了對患者至關重要的流程，確保在正確的時間提供正確的藥物。

Culling the Herd: How to Stop Pharma Inventory Waste and Protect What Matters

 

Culling the Herd: How to Stop Pharma Inventory Waste and Protect What Matters

In the pharmaceutical world, inventory management is a high-stakes game. Companies often carry a vast number of product variations, or SKUs (Stock Keeping Units), to meet market demands. However, this common practice leads to a silent but significant problem: a warehouse full of slow-moving stock that eventually expires, forcing companies to write it off as a total loss. At the same time, this clutter can obscure the true state of the supply chain, leaving critical, life-saving drugs understocked.

This challenge is a classic case for the Theory of Constraints (TOC), which provides a clear path to prioritize and protect what's most important. Instead of treating all products equally, TOC helps us differentiate between what truly matters and what's simply taking up space and costing money.

---

The Problem: A Tale of Two SKUs

Imagine a pharmaceutical company with thousands of different product variants. Some are blockbuster drugs used daily by millions, while others are rare medications for a specific, small patient population. Without a smart strategy, both are treated similarly by the inventory system. This results in:

• Excessive Waste: Low-demand SKUs sit on shelves for months or years, ultimately expiring and being thrown away. This is not just a financial loss; it's a major source of waste.

• Patient Risk: The company's focus is spread thin, and the most important, fast-moving drugs may not receive the attention they need. This can lead to stockouts of life-saving medicines, which carries a far greater cost than any financial loss.

---

The TOC Cure: A Simple, Three-Step Prescription

The solution lies in applying TOC's principles to inventory management. It’s about being strategic and focusing on throughput, which is the rate at which the system generates money.

1. Rank Your SKUs by Throughput:

   First, we must stop treating all products as equal. Using throughput accounting, we rank every SKU not just by sales volume, but by its contribution to the company's throughput. This means we look at the gross profit an SKU generates, minus any direct costs. More importantly, we also consider its clinical value. This step gives us a clear picture of what’s truly valuable.

   Example with Numbers:

   Let's look at three hypothetical SKUs:

   • SKU A (Lifesaving Vaccine): Sells 100 units per month, with a profit of $500 per unit. Monthly Throughput: $50,000. Clinical Value: Extremely high.

   • SKU B (Common Pain Reliever): Sells 10,000 units per month, with a profit of $10 per unit. Monthly Throughput: $100,000. Clinical Value: High.

   • SKU C (Rare Dietary Supplement): Sells 20 units per month, with a profit of $20 per unit. Monthly Throughput: $400. Clinical Value: Low.

   Throughput accounting immediately highlights that while SKU B has the highest sales volume, SKU A's critical nature and high per-unit value make it equally, if not more, important to protect. SKU C, however, has a negligible contribution.

2. Cull the Non-Performers:

   Once you've ranked your SKUs, you'll find that a small number of products are responsible for the vast majority of your throughput. You'll also identify a group of low-impact SKUs with negligible throughput contribution. The cure is simple: reduce the SKU count by eliminating these non-essential products. This frees up capital, warehouse space, and management focus, all of which were previously wasted on items that provided minimal value.

   Example with Numbers:

   After our analysis, the company decides to discontinue SKU C. By doing this, they free up the space and labor previously dedicated to managing a product that only generated $400 per month in throughput. This resource can now be redirected to more profitable or critical products.

3. Differentiate Your Buffers:

   With your inventory streamlined, you can now apply a tailored approach to managing what's left. Instead of one-size-fits-all safety stock levels, you create differentiated buffers.

   Example with Numbers:

   Let's assume a typical safety stock is a 2-month supply for all products.

   • SKU A (Lifesaving Vaccine): We increase the buffer to a 4-month supply to protect against any disruption. Instead of just 200 units on hand, we now maintain 400 units, ensuring patients are never at risk of a stockout.

   • SKU B (Common Pain Reliever): We keep its buffer at a 2-month supply, which is sufficient for a high-demand, stable product. We maintain 20,000 units.

   • SKU C (Rare Dietary Supplement): Having culled it from the inventory, we have a 0-month supplyas it is no longer stocked.

---

The Result: A Healthier Inventory

By applying these TOC principles, a pharma company can transform its inventory from a cluttered, wasteful mess into a lean, efficient system. They stop focusing on products that drain resources and start protecting the products that save lives. This approach not only lowers waste and cost but, more importantly, protects patient-critical flows, ensuring the right drug is always available at the right time.

加速您的醫藥冷鏈：從一級方程式賽車維修站學到的經驗

 

加速您的醫藥冷鏈：從一級方程式賽車維修站學到的經驗

一級方程式（F1）賽車的世界講求速度、精確度和零失誤。維修站（pit stop）是維修團隊在不到兩秒鐘的時間內，為賽車更換輪胎、有時甚至更換前翼的過程，堪稱是效率的典範。信不信由你，高風險、快節奏的醫藥冷鏈物流世界，可以從這些閃電般的動作中學到很多。就像一輛F1賽車需要毫無阻礙地回到賽道上一樣，您的溫控藥品也需要毫無差錯地通過供應鏈。

維修站：冷鏈瓶頸的完美類比

將您的整個冷鏈想像成一場F1比賽。旅程的每個環節——從製造到倉儲，通過海關，最終送達患者手中——都是一圈。就像賽車一樣，如果有一個緩慢的環節，您的產品可能會損失寶貴的時間，甚至更糟，被損壞。

約束理論（Theory of Constraints, TOC）教我們找到那個「緩慢點」——即瓶頸或「約束」——並加以解決。在我們的冷鏈案例中，溫控集貨轉運中心（cross-dock hub）被認定為主要約束。這就是您的維修站。在這裡，不同的貨物抵達，被快速分揀，然後裝載到其他卡車上，以進行下一段旅程。如果這個集貨轉運中心緩慢、雜亂無章或資源不足，您的整個冷鏈就會停滯，就像一次失敗的維修站操作會讓車手輸掉比賽一樣。

---

將 F1 維修站原則應用於您的冷鏈

讓我們分解一下，F1 維修站的效率經驗如何直接轉化為改善您的冷鏈：

1. 確定維修站（約束）：

   • F1： 維修站是一個已知的瓶頸。車隊設計整個比賽策略，就是為了最大程度地減少在那裡花費的時間。

   • 冷鏈： 我們確定了溫控集貨轉運中心。這是多個入庫貨物匯集並分揀以進行出庫運輸的地方。由於換手次數多以及對速度和溫控的要求，它是一個天然的瓶頸。

2. 利用維修團隊（消除非增值活動）：

   • F1： 每個維修站成員都有高度專業化的角色。沒有浪費的動作，沒有閒置的人手。從換胎工具的使用到千斤頂的操作，每個動作都至關重要。

   • 冷鏈： 在您的集貨轉運中心，「利用」意味著確保每個人和每件事都在最高效率下運作。消除非增值活動：員工是否在等待指令？設備是否閒置？流程是否可以簡化？就像F1車隊練習了數千次維修站一樣，您的集貨轉運中心團隊需要精簡的程序和明確的角色，以確保人員和設備的正常運作。醫藥產品每多一秒暴露或等待，風險就增加一分。

3. 服從維修站的節奏（調整排程）：

   • F1： 整個比賽策略、油量和輪胎選擇都是為了支援維修站策略而制定的。車手確切知道何時進站以及維修團隊的速度有多快。

   • 冷鏈： 與其讓供應商在他們方便的時候發貨（導致大量、不可預測的貨物批次），我們需要調整補貨批次大小和供應商排程，使其服從於集貨轉運中心的節奏。這意味著進行小型、頻繁且精確定時的交付，這樣集貨轉運中心可以高效處理而不會超載。這就像讓賽車一輛一輛地進入維修站，而不是同時湧入。

4. 為意外情況設置緩衝（保護產品）：

   • F1： 儘管不完全是「緩衝」，但車隊為維修站期間可能出現的問題（如輪胎螺母卡住）制定了應急計劃。他們還確保新輪胎已準備就緒並等候。

   • 冷鏈： 這對於溫控產品至關重要。我們引入緩衝來防禦延遲：

     • 入庫貨物時間緩衝： 為入庫貨物預留一些額外的時間。即使一輛卡車延遲了15分鐘，集貨轉運中心也不會立即陷入混亂。這就像在比賽中保持微弱領先，這樣小的維修站延遲不會讓您丟失位置。

     • 預先準備好的保溫緩衝包： 想像一下，如果維修團隊必須去另一個車庫取輪胎！通過在集貨轉運中心準備好保溫緩衝包（例如冰袋等冷卻元件），它們在轉運過程中可以立即用來保護產品，最大限度地減少暴露時間並確保溫度完整性。

登上領獎台

透過採用這些 F1 維修站原則，您的醫藥冷鏈可以實現顯著的進步。您將從被動應對故障轉變為主動、高效的系統。藥品能更快、更安全地到達患者手中，從而減少浪費、成本和法律風險。這一切都是關於認識到冷鏈中的「維修站」是贏得或輸掉比賽的關鍵點，並以一支冠軍車隊的精確度對其進行優化。

Turbocharging Your Pharma Cold Chain: Lessons from the F1 Pit Stop

 

Turbocharging Your Pharma Cold Chain: Lessons from the F1 Pit Stop

The world of Formula 1 racing is all about speed, precision, and zero errors. A pit stop, where a car screeches in, gets new tires, and sometimes even a new front wing, all in under two seconds, is a masterclass in efficiency. Believe it or not, the high-stakes, fast-paced world of pharma cold chain logistics has a lot to learn from these lightning-fast maneuvers. Just like an F1 car needs to get back on the track without a hitch, your temperature-sensitive medicines need to move through the supply chain flawlessly.

The Pit Stop: A Perfect Analogy for Your Cold Chain Constraint

Think of your entire cold chain as a Formula 1 race. Each leg of the journey – from manufacturing to warehousing,through customs, and finally to the patient – is a lap. And just like a race car, your product can lose valuable time, or worse, be damaged, if there's a slow point.

The Theory of Constraints (TOC) teaches us to find that "slow point" – the bottleneck or "constraint" – and fix it. In our cold chain example, the temperature-controlled cross-dock hub was identified as the biggest constraint. This is your pit lane. It's where different shipments arrive, are quickly sorted, and then loaded onto other trucks for their next leg of the journey. If this cross-dock is slow, disorganized, or under-resourced, your entire cold chain grinds to a halt, just like a botched pit stop can cost a driver the race.

Applying F1 Pit Stop Principles to Your Cold Chain

Let's break down how an F1 pit stop's efficiency lessons translate directly to improving your cold chain:

1. Identify the Pit Lane (Constraint):

   • F1: The pit lane is a known bottleneck. Teams design their entire race strategy around minimizing time there.

   • Cold Chain: We identified the cross-dock at the temperature-controlled hub. This is where multiple incoming shipments converge and are sorted for outbound transport. It’s a natural choke point due to the number of handovers and the need for speed and temperature control.

2. Exploit the Pit Crew (Eliminate Non-Value Activities):

   • F1: Every pit crew member has a highly specialized role. There's no wasted movement, no idle hands. Each action, from wheel gunning to jack operation, is essential.

   • Cold Chain: At your cross-dock, "exploiting" means ensuring everyone and everything is working at peak efficiency. Eliminate non-value activities: Are staff waiting for instructions? Is equipment sitting idle? Can processes be simplified? Just like an F1 team practices thousands of pit stops, your cross-dock team needs streamlined procedures and clear roles to ensure staff and equipment uptime. Every second a pharma product is exposed or waiting is a risk.

3. Subordinate to the Pit Stop's Rhythm (Adjust Schedules):

   • F1: The entire race strategy, fuel loads, and tire choices are made to support the pit stop strategy. The driver knows exactly when to come in and how fast the crew will be.

   • Cold Chain: Instead of having vendors ship whenever it's convenient for them (leading to huge,unpredictable batches), we need to subordinate reorder batch sizes and vendor schedules to the cross-dock's rhythm. This means small, frequent, and precisely timed deliveries that the cross-dock can handle efficiently without getting overwhelmed. It's like having cars arrive in the pit lane one by one, rather than all at once.

4. Buffer for the Unexpected (Protect the Product):

   • F1: While not a "buffer" in the same sense, teams have contingency plans for issues during a pit stop, like a sticky wheel nut. They also ensure fresh tires are ready and waiting.

   • Cold Chain: This is crucial for temperature-sensitive products. We introduce buffers to protect against delays:

     • Time buffer on inbound shipments: Build in a little extra time for incoming shipments. If a truck is delayed by 15 minutes, the cross-dock isn't immediately thrown into chaos. This is like having a slight lead in a race, so a small pit stop delay doesn't lose you a position.

     • Thermal buffer packs pre-positioned: Imagine if the pit crew had to go fetch the tires from another garage! By having thermal buffer packs (cooling elements like gel packs) already at the cross-dock,they are immediately available to protect products during transfer, minimizing exposure time and ensuring temperature integrity.

The Podium Finish

By adopting these F1 pit stop principles, your pharma cold chain can achieve remarkable gains. You move from a reactive model, frantically dealing with failures, to a proactive, highly efficient system. Medicines reach patients faster and more safely, reducing waste, costs, and legal risks. It's about recognizing that the "pit stop" in your cold chain is where the race can be won or lost, and optimizing it with the precision of a championship-winning team.

郵政服務的崩壞：如何用「切身利害」原則拯救英國皇家郵政

 

郵政服務的崩壞：如何用「切身利害」原則拯救英國皇家郵政

郵件沒有準時送達。更準確地說，它們以自己的時間表到達，而非顧客所期望的。從社區傳來的案例並非個例，那裡的居民報告在等待數週後，才一次性收到「一大疊」郵件。這些故事反映出郵政服務系統性崩壞的一個徵兆，這對英國許多人來說，已成為一個令人沮喪的現實。

投訴內容從平信需要兩週才能送達，到全國各地某些郵件中心和投遞站出現服務問題。這些服務失靈不僅給個人和企業帶來不便，也侵蝕了人們對這項基本公共服務的信任。問題不僅僅出在物流上，更是問責制度的崩潰。

---

改善方案：應用塔雷伯的「切身利害」原則

要修復一個崩壞的系統，我們必須確保從中受益的人，也同樣承擔其失敗的後果。這是哲學家暨統計學家納西姆·尼可拉斯·塔雷伯（Nassim Nicholas Taleb）所闡述的「切身利害」（Skin in the Game）原則的核心。這是一個簡單而強大的理念：永遠不要相信那些在行動結果中沒有自身利害關係的人。

將此原則應用於郵政服務，需要從郵差到政府部長，對組織中的每個層級的激勵機制進行根本性重新評估。

1. 針對郵差與地方管理層

目前，郵差的主要動機是完成路線，而不管服務品質如何。來自「Fuse」的案例顯示，努力與結果之間存在明顯脫節。要引入「切身利害」，可以將郵差的一部分薪資與顧客能直接看到的績效指標掛鉤，這包括：

• 顧客滿意度評分： 建立一個數位或實體回饋系統，讓居民可以評價其收件的可靠性。

• 準時投遞獎金： 根據準時送達一等郵件和特快專遞的表現給予獎金。

• 去中心化問責制： 賦予地方經理直接根據其轄區內的顧客回饋和服務數據來獎勵或懲罰員工的權力。這將問責制在地化，讓不良服務的後果更直接且個人化。

2. 針對英國皇家郵政高層

皇家郵政的領導層應當承擔其決策帶來的財務和聲譽風險。「切身利害」原則在這裡意味著：

• 績效掛鉤薪酬： 高管的獎金和股票期權應取決於其在投遞時間、顧客投訴和服務可靠性等關鍵績效指標上的表現，而不僅僅是整體利潤。

• 監管罰款： 監管機構 Ofcom 應對持續性的服務失靈處以巨額且累進的罰款。這些罰款應足以對公司的底線產生實質性影響，迫使公司將服務品質置於節約成本之上。

3. 針對負責郵政事務的政府部長

對於一項公共服務而言，最終的問責權在於政府。一位部長的「切身利害」是他們的政治聲譽和對公共服務的承諾。為確保他們不會被不良郵政服務的後果所隔絕，需要一個新框架：

• 公開績效審查： 部長辦公室應被要求定期發布關於皇家郵政績效的透明報告，包括投訴和投遞失靈的數據，並在未能達成目標時接受公眾審查。

• 直接部長級監督： 當服務水準降至不可接受的標準時，部長應有權干預並要求皇家郵政領導層提出具體行動計畫。如此，他們的職業生涯和政治遺產將與這項基本服務的成敗直接掛鉤。

透過在每個層級引入「切身利害」原則，我們可以擺脫相互推卸責任的系統，轉向一個共同承擔責任的體系。這種從郵差到政府部長的激勵機制上的根本性轉變，是確保皇家郵政再次履行其服務大眾承諾的唯一途徑。