顯示具有 Liberty 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 Liberty 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2026年1月2日 星期五

命運的迴轉:為何英國的奴役之路並非必然】

【命運的迴轉:為何英國的奴役之路並非必然】

英國真的「沒救了」嗎?看著創紀錄的高稅負、「保姆國家」式的過度擴張,以及能源與住房日益依賴中央計畫,人們很容易得出結論:我們已經走在海耶克(Friedrich Hayek)所恐懼的道路半途了。然而,海耶克的教導從來不是預言「必然的滅亡」,而是一份旨在激發行動的警告

通往奴役之路是一種選擇,而非宿命。若要在未來 24 個月內扭轉局面,英國必須實施一套植根於海耶克三大支柱的「大自由化」戰略。

一、 恢復「法治」而非「法令」

海耶克區分了「立法」(政府的任意命令)與「法治」(普遍、可預測的規則)。

  • 行動建議: 政府必須停止「以法令治理」或利用法定文書繞過議會審查的行為。在未來 24 個月內,必須廢除那些賦予官僚對企業和私人言論擁有裁量權的模糊法規。

二、 拆解經濟中的「知識之妄」

目前對「工業戰略」和在綠能產業中「挑選贏家」的迷戀,正是海耶克警告過的行為。沒有任何專家委員會能為 6700 萬人預測出最優的能源組合或住房佈局。

  • 行動建議: 放棄國家主導的投資計畫。相反,應大幅削減公司稅與個人所得稅,將購買力歸還給人民。讓市場的自發秩序(由數百萬個人的獨立決策驅動)來決定哪些技術和企業能脫穎而出。

三、 將生存從「國家贊助」中解耦

通往奴役之路最危險的一步,是國家成為安全感的唯一提供者。當人們依賴國家發放「每日食糧」時,就失去了異議的能力。

  • 行動建議: 深度改革福利與醫療體系,鼓勵私人提供與個人責任。目標是將公民從「國家的客戶」重新轉變為「獨立的行動者」。

希望依然存在,因為自由是一種具備自我修復功能的機制。目前的停滯是「計畫」的結果;而藥方則是恢復「自發秩序」。


The U-Turn of Destiny: Why Britain’s Road to Serfdom is Not Inevitable



[The U-Turn of Destiny: Why Britain’s Road to Serfdom is Not Inevitable]

Are we "doomed" in the UK? Looking at the record-high tax burden, the expansion of the "nanny state," and the increasing reliance on central planning for energy and housing, one might conclude that we are already halfway down Hayek’s dreaded path. However, Hayek’s teachings were never meant to be a prophecy of certain doom; they were a warning intended to provoke action.

The road to serfdom is a choice, not a fate. To reverse course within the next 24 months, the UK must implement a "Great Liberalization" strategy rooted in three Hayekian pillars.

1. Restore the Rule of Law (Not Just Legislation)

Hayek distinguished between "Legislation" (arbitrary government commands) and the "Rule of Law" (general, predictable rules).1

  • The Action: The government must cease the practice of "governing by decree" or using statutory instruments to bypass parliamentary scrutiny. In the next 24 months, we must repeal vague regulations that give bureaucrats discretionary power over businesses and private speech.

2. Dismantle the "Pretense of Knowledge" in Economics

The current obsession with "industrial strategy" and "picking winners" in the green energy sector is exactly what Hayek warned against. No committee of experts can predict the optimal energy mix or housing layout for 67 million people.

  • The Action: Abandon state-led investment schemes. Instead, slash corporate and personal taxes to return purchasing power to the people. Let the spontaneous order of the market—driven by millions of individual decisions—determine which technologies and businesses thrive.

3. Decouple Survival from State Patronage

The most dangerous step on the road to serfdom is when the state becomes the sole provider of security. When people rely on the state for their "daily bread," they lose the ability to dissent.

  • The Action: Deeply reform the welfare and healthcare systems to encourage private provision and personal responsibility. The goal is to transform the citizen from a "client of the state" back into an "independent agent."

There is hope because freedom is a self-correcting mechanism. The current stagnation is the result of planning; the cure is the restoration of the spontaneous order.



2025年10月5日 星期日

The Distinction Between Freedom and Liberty: Concepts and Applications

 

The Distinction Between Freedom and Liberty: Concepts and Applications

In Western political philosophy, Freedom and Liberty are often translated into Chinese using the single term 自由(zìyóu). However, the two English terms have subtle yet crucial differences in meaning and application.


Conceptual Differences

AspectFreedomLiberty
Chinese Translation自由 (zìyóu)自由權 (zìyóu quán) or 人身自由 (rénshēn zìyóu, Personal Liberty)
NatureA broad, abstract, philosophical state of being—the absence of all restraint.A concrete, legal, or political right—a specific privilege granted or guaranteed within a legal or social framework.
FocusFocuses on ability and possibility: what a person can do (Positive Freedom) or a state where noexternal restraint exists.Focuses on law and social framework: what a person is entitled to do, typically freedom from governmental or external interference.
EtymologyRooted in an Old Germanic word, meaning "dear/friend," emphasizing self-mastery.Rooted in the Latin libertas, meaning "a free person," emphasizing a legal status free from slavery or despotism.

Specific Applications and Examples

Application ContextUsage and Examples for FreedomUsage and Examples for Liberty
Political PhilosophyDistinguishes Positive Freedom: the capacity to pursue self-realization and control one's own destiny.Distinguishes Negative Liberty: the domain free from external coercion or interference.
Example: The freedom to receive an education is the ability to gain knowledge and achieve potential.Example: The liberty of speech is the right to speak without legal penalty.
Law and ConstitutionLess common in legal statutes, more often describes an ideal state or atmosphere.A core element of fundamental human rights. Often appears in the plural: Liberties (rights or privileges).
Example: Freedom from fear is a broad state of peace and security.Example: Personal Liberty (or Civil Liberty) guarantees the right not to be unlawfully arrested or detained.
Personal StateEmphasizes spiritual or emotional release; a sense of being unfettered.Emphasizes physical or procedural release; a legal right to movement.
Example: Economic freedom is the abilityto manage one's finances without undue state restriction.Example: A prisoner is given his liberty (regains freedom) upon release from detention.
Manners/ProtocolAutonomy of action; an unrestrained pattern of behavior.A presumptuous action, referring to overstepping boundaries of politeness or accepted limits.
Example: She has the freedom to choose her working hours.Example: To take the liberty of doing something is to do something without permission (I took the liberty of calling him).

Summary Examples: Freedom vs. Liberty

  1. Political Rights: The Constitution guarantees the liberty of the press (a right) so that citizens may operate in a freedom of information (a state) environment.

  2. Release/Exemption: A company is given the liberty (a privilege) to temporarily bypass a certain regulation, allowing it to operate with greater freedom (less restraint).

  3. Capacity vs. Right: Having the freedom to change your life means having the capacity to do so; having the liberty to change your residence means you have the legal right to do so.

Freedom is often the ultimate goal or total state of beingLiberty is the legal or political guarantee required to achieve that goal.