Distinguishing “Products” in Operations from “Throughput Generators” in a Marketing Mindset
Executive Summary
In many organizations, the same offering is treated simultaneously as a product to be efficiently produced (operations mindset) and as a mechanism to generate throughput (marketing mindset). Confusion between these two lenses leads to suboptimal decisions—often maximizing local efficiency while damaging global throughput.
The key distinction is that not every product is a throughput generator, and not every throughput generator should be optimized operationally.
1. Two fundamentally different lenses
Operations mindset: “The product”
Operations typically sees a product as:
A unit that consumes resources
Has a standard cost
Should flow smoothly and efficiently
Should maximize utilization and minimize waste
Implicit assumptions:
More units produced = better
Lower unit cost = better
Bottlenecks should be exploited to produce more units
From this lens, a product is something to optimize, standardize, and accelerate.
Marketing / throughput mindset: “The throughput generator”
Marketing (at its best) sees offerings as:
Vehicles to generate revenue
Levers that influence customer behavior
Anchors, bundles, or gateways
Signals of value, positioning, and differentiation
Implicit assumptions:
Some offerings exist to sell other offerings
Some offerings should be constrained, not expanded
Profitability is systemic, not per-unit
From this lens, a “product” may exist primarily to:
Attract customers
Shift demand
Enable pricing power
Increase lifetime value
2. The critical TOC distinction
From a TOC perspective:
A product in operations is a flow unit.
A throughput generator in marketing is a leverage point.
Confusing the two leads to decisions that:
Increase local efficiency
Reduce global throughput
Inflate operating expense
Destroy strategic positioning
3. Examples of products that are not throughput generators
Example 1: Buffet premium items (your roast beef case)
Operations view:
Roast beef is a product
Carving station is a constraint
Goal: increase carving speed
Marketing / throughput view:
Roast beef is a cost driver
It creates perceived value
It attracts customers but should not be over-consumed
Key insight:
Roast beef is a differentiator, not a throughput generator.
Its job is to justify price, not to be consumed in volume.
Example 2: Loss leaders in retail
Operations view:
Loss leader SKU has negative margin
Should be eliminated or cost-reduced
Marketing view:
Loss leader generates store traffic
Drives attachment sales
Increases basket size
TOC insight:
The loss leader is not a product to optimize—it is a throughput catalyst.
Over-optimizing it destroys its economic role.
Example 3: Free software features
Operations view:
Feature consumes development and support capacity
Low or zero revenue
Marketing view:
Feature reduces friction
Drives adoption
Enables conversion to paid tiers
TOC insight:
The feature is not the product; it is the sales engine.
4. Examples of throughput generators that should not be operationally optimized
Example 4: Premium tiers and scarcity
Operations view:
Idle capacity in premium services is “waste”
Should fill all slots
Marketing view:
Scarcity creates desirability
Empty capacity preserves price integrity
Result:
Operational efficiency undermines pricing power.
Example 5: Human interaction in high-end sales
Operations view:
Sales conversations are slow and expensive
Should be automated or shortened
Marketing view:
Time spent builds trust
Justifies premium pricing
TOC insight:
The constraint (salesperson time) is a value amplifier, not a throughput limiter.
5. When operations optimization backfires
This conflict often appears as an Evaporating Cloud:
Goal (A): Maximize organizational profitability
Need (B): Efficient operations to control costs
Need (C): Strong market pull and pricing power
Action (D): Maximize throughput of all products
Action (D’): Constrain or slow certain offerings
Hidden assumption to challenge:
“All products contribute to throughput in proportion to their volume.”
Once this assumption is surfaced, the conflict evaporates.
6. Practical diagnostic questions
To distinguish a product from a throughput generator, ask:
If customers consumed more of this, would profit increase or decrease?
Does this offering justify price, or generate volume?
If this were constrained, would demand shift beneficially?
Is this item meant to be consumed—or to influence behavior?
If the answers point to behavior shaping rather than revenue generation, you are looking at a throughput generator, not an operational product.
7. Managerial implications
For operations leaders:
Not all bottlenecks should be exploited
Some “inefficiencies” are strategic
Ask: What economic role does this flow unit play?
For marketing leaders:
Understand capacity constraints
Avoid creating pull for economically destructive volume
Design offers that respect the system constraint
For executives:
Align on the unit of throughput
Prevent local optimization wars
Explicitly classify offerings as:
Revenue generators
Cost drivers
Differentiators
Behavioral levers
8. Closing TOC insight
Throughput is not about flow of products.
It is about flow of value toward the goal.
Operations optimizes flow.
Marketing designs leverage.
The system wins only when both are aligned.
發表文章
