The Dual Face of the Coupon Era: Foreign Exchange Certificates vs. Ration Coupons (and other tickets) in a Planned Economy
Two unique currency and rationing systems in China's past: Foreign Exchange Certificates (FECs) and grain coupons (糧票) (along with other coupons like cloth coupons, match coupons, etc.). Both were products of specific historical contexts, reflecting governmental intentions in resource management and social control, and both inevitably spawned thriving black markets. Together, they paint a picture of an era characterized by material scarcity, restricted circulation, but also robust民间智慧 (folk wisdom) and demand.
I. Foreign Exchange Certificates (FECs): A Special "Quasi-Currency" in the Early Opening Up
Historical Context and Government Intentions:
Foreign Exchange Certificates were officially issued in 1980 and circulated until 1994. Their birth occurred during the early stages of China's reform and opening-up. At that time, China urgently needed to attract foreign investment and develop tourism but faced the reality of insufficient foreign exchange reserves and a non-freely convertible Renminbi (RMB). The government's primary intentions for issuing FECs were:
Managing Foreign Exchange Inflow: Allowing foreigners, overseas Chinese, and Hong Kong and Macao compatriots to convert their foreign currency into FECs for specific consumption within China (e.g., at designated hotels for foreigners, Friendship Stores, exclusive import good shops). This channeled foreign spending into specific avenues, facilitating national control and recovery of foreign exchange.
Protecting Domestic Market Stability: Preventing a large influx of foreign currency directly into the domestic market, which could have impacted the fragile price system and RMB exchange rate at the time, thereby maintaining socialist financial order.
Increasing Non-Trade Foreign Exchange Income: Through the issuance and use of FECs, the government indirectly encouraged foreign spending within China, increasing the nation's foreign exchange income.
Distinguishing Domestic and International Consumer Groups: The exclusive nature of FECs created a distinction in consumption levels between foreigners and Chinese citizens, which to some extent reflected the "internal-external differentiation" policy of that era.
Emergence of the Black Market:
Despite strict government regulations, a black market for FECs was exceptionally active. The reasons for this included:
Internal-External Price Differences: Imported goods and high-quality domestic products sold in foreign-oriented establishments like Friendship Stores were "luxuries" that ordinary Chinese citizens could not purchase with RMB. This created significant price disparities between the internal and external markets.
Foreigner Demand: Although foreigners held FECs, they sometimes wished to shop at non-foreign-oriented small stores or street stalls to experience a more "authentic" Chinese life, and these places only accepted RMB.
Arbitrage Opportunities: While FECs were officially declared equivalent to RMB, in the black market, due to market supply and demand dynamics and the privilege of FECs to purchase scarce goods, their price was significantly higher than RMB (e.g., 100 yuan FECs might be exchanged for 130 yuan or more in RMB in the black market).
Consequently, a large number of "scalpers" emerged, gathering at hotels, Friendship Stores, and even outside banks, to buy FECs at low prices from foreigners or provide foreign exchange-to-RMB conversion services. They would then sell these FECs at a higher price to Chinese citizens eager to buy imported goods. The existence of this black market, to some extent, compensated for the shortcomings of the market mechanism at the time, allowing some scarce goods to circulate, but it also fostered rent-seeking behavior and social inequality.
II. Ration Coupons (糧票) and Other Coupons: Material Allocation Vouchers in a Planned Economy
Historical Context and Government Intentions:
Grain coupons (糧票), cloth coupons (布票), cooking oil coupons (食用油票), match coupons (火柴票), soap coupons (肥皂票), and even bicycle coupons (自行車票), sewing machine coupons (縫韌機票), television coupons (電視機票), etc., were crucial components of China's long-term material rationing system during the planned economy era (roughly mid-1950s to early 1990s). The primary reasons for their existence and government intentions were:
Coping with Material Scarcity: In the early stages of national economic development, productivity was low, and material supply was severely insufficient. To guarantee the basic living needs of urban and rural residents and prevent social chaos caused by panic buying, the government decided to implement unified allocation of daily necessities.
Ensuring Fair Distribution: In the context of material shortages, the coupon system aimed to ensure that everyone could obtain basic necessities according to fixed quotas, achieving "per capita" fair distribution and preventing a few individuals from hoarding.
Controlling Consumption and Investment: By controlling the issuance of coupons, the government could precisely control total social consumption, allocating more resources to national construction and industrial development.
Stabilizing Prices: Purchases made with coupons were typically at state-regulated low prices, which helped maintain price stability and prevent inflation.
Emergence of the Black Market:
Despite the strict coupon system, black market transactions were equally prevalent, for the following reasons:
Individual Demand Differences and Insufficient Quotas: Although rationing was implemented, each family's demographic structure, living habits, and consumption needs varied. Some families didn't have enough grain coupons, while others had leftovers; some urgently needed cloth for clothes, while others didn't. The fixed quotas of coupons often failed to meet all individual needs.
Pursuit of Scarce Goods: For coupons for larger items (like bicycles, watches, televisions), due to extremely low production volumes, obtaining them was incredibly difficult. The value of these coupons far exceeded their face value, becoming extremely scarce commodities.
Geographical Restrictions: Many coupons had geographical limitations; for example, local grain coupons could only circulate within the province, while national grain coupons could be used nationwide. This created black market demand for inter-regional transactions.
Therefore, people would secretly sell their unwanted coupons (such as liquor coupons, sugar coupons, etc.) to those who needed them, or exchange coupons for other physical goods. For instance, leftover grain coupons might be traded for eggs, cooking oil, etc., or excess cloth coupons sold at a high price. These transactions typically took place in hidden corners, on the fringes of free markets. Participants risked arrest, but high profits and real demand drove their activities. The black market was not only a manifestation of economic vitality but also a silent resistance to the rigid allocation mechanisms of the planned economy.
III. Similarities and Differences: A Comparison of the Two "Tickets"
Although Foreign Exchange Certificates and various daily necessities coupons both fall under the category of "tickets" and both spawned black markets, their essence and objectives differed significantly:
Feature/Aspect | Foreign Exchange Certificates (FECs) | Ration Coupons (糧票 & others) |
Issuance Period | Early Reform and Opening Up (1980-1994) | Planned Economy Era (mid-1950s-early 1990s) |
Government Intent | Manage foreign exchange, attract foreign investment, differentiate domestic/foreign consumption, stabilize exchange rate. | Manage scarce materials, ensure basic living, control total consumption, stabilize prices. |
Target Audience | Foreigners, overseas Chinese, Hong Kong/Macao compatriots. | All urban and rural residents (based on household registration and occupation for quotas). |
Exchange/Voucher For | Foreign currency (effectively a redeemable claim for foreign currency). | Physical goods (grain, cloth, matches, etc.). |
Pricing Mechanism | Officially "equivalent" to RMB, but at a premium in the black market. | Purchase at state-regulated low prices with coupons; impossible to buy or high prices in black market without coupons. |
Black Market Cause | Discrepancies in goods and prices between internal/external markets, foreign currency demand, arbitrage opportunities. | Material scarcity, individual demand differences, insufficient quotas. |
Economic Impact | A tool for managing foreign exchange, but also created economic dual-track system and a sense of unfairness. | Maintained basic living stability, but stifled market vitality and fostered an underground economy. |
Abolition Reason | China's foreign exchange management reform, achieving RMB current account convertibility, moving towards marketization. | Increased productivity, abundant materials, development of market economy; state no longer needed planned allocation. |
Similarities:
Government Control: Both were tools used by the government, through administrative means, to allocate and control resources during specific historical periods.
Dual Tracks: Whether it was the dual track system of FECs and RMB, or the reality of coupon-based purchases vs. no goods without coupons, both created de facto "dual markets" or "dual currency" systems.
Inevitability of Black Markets: As long as there is a gap between "official" supply and "private" demand, and the official system cannot fully meet or effectively regulate it, a black market will inevitably emerge, which is a reflection of market forces.
Conclusion: The Mirror of History
Foreign Exchange Certificates and various daily necessities coupons represent a highly distinctive historical chapter in China's economic development. They are a microcosm of that era's material scarcity and strong governmental control, as well as a testament to ordinary people's struggles for survival and search for adaptability in difficult circumstances. The existence of black markets, though illegal, reflected the intrinsic dynamism of economic activity and the resilience of people's material needs.
Today, as we look back at the history of these "tickets," it is not merely to recall the past but to understand profound lessons about the relationship between currency and power. Whether for managing foreign exchange or allocating materials, any attempt to completely replace or suppress the market through administrative means often leads to the emergence of unofficial markets. This historical insight also provides a valuable perspective for understanding the interplay between contemporary digital currencies, regulation, and the market.
發表文章
