要修復一個崩壞的系統,我們必須確保從中受益的人,也同樣承擔其失敗的後果。這是哲學家暨統計學家納西姆·尼可拉斯·塔雷伯(Nassim Nicholas Taleb)所闡述的「切身利害」(Skin in the Game)原則的核心。這是一個簡單而強大的理念:永遠不要相信那些在行動結果中沒有自身利害關係的人。
The Post is Broken: How Royal Mail's Service Failures Demand a "Skin in the Game" Fix
The post is not arriving. Or, to be more precise, it's arriving on its own schedule, not the one a customer might reasonably expect. Anecdotes from communities where residents report receiving a "whole stack" of mail in a single, sporadic delivery after weeks of waiting, are not isolated incidents. They are a symptom of a systemic breakdown in service that has become a frustrating reality for many across the UK.
Complaints range from standard letters taking up to two weeks to arrive to documented nationwide issues with specific mail centers and delivery offices. These service failures not only inconvenience individuals and businesses but erode trust in an essential public service. The problem is not merely a logistical one; it's a breakdown of accountability.
A Proposal for Improvement: Applying Taleb's "Skin in the Game"
To fix a broken system, we must ensure that those who benefit from its success also bear the consequences of its failure. This is the core principle of "skin in the game" as articulated by philosopher and statistician Nassim Nicholas Taleb. It is a simple but powerful idea: never trust someone who does not have a personal stake in the outcome of their actions.
Applied to the postal service, this concept requires a fundamental re-evaluation of incentives at every level of the organization, from the post person to the government minister.
1. For Post Persons and Local Management
Currently, the primary incentive for a postal worker is to complete their route, regardless of the quality of the service. The anecdotes from "Fuse" suggest a clear disconnect between effort and outcome. To introduce "skin in the game," a portion of a postal worker's pay could be tied to performance metrics directly visible to the customer. This could include:
Customer Satisfaction Ratings: A digital or physical feedback system where residents can rate the reliability of their deliveries.
Time-Sensitive Delivery Success: Performance bonuses for meeting targets on first-class and special delivery items.
Decentralized Accountability: Empowering local managers to directly reward or penalize staff based on customer feedback and service data for their specific area. This localizes the accountability, making the consequences of poor service more direct and personal.
2. For the Royal Mail Executive Leadership
The leadership of Royal Mail should be exposed to the financial and reputational risks of their decisions. The "skin in the game" principle here would mean:
Performance-Based Compensation: Executive bonuses and stock options should be contingent on achieving key performance indicators (KPIs) related to delivery times, customer complaints, and service reliability, not just overall profit.
Regulatory Penalties: The regulator, Ofcom, should impose significant, escalating fines for persistent service failures. These fines should be structured to meaningfully impact the company's bottom line, forcing a re-prioritization of service quality over cost-cutting measures.
3. For the Minister Overseeing the Postal Service
For a public service, the final accountability lies with the government. A minister's "skin in the game" is their political reputation and their commitment to public service. To ensure they are not insulated from the consequences of poor postal service, a new framework is needed:
Public Performance Reviews: The minister's office should be required to publish regular, transparent reports on Royal Mail's performance, including data on complaints and delivery failures, and face public scrutiny when targets are missed.
Direct Ministerial Oversight: The minister should have the authority to intervene and demand specific action plans from Royal Mail's leadership when service drops below an acceptable standard. Their career progression and legacy would then be directly tied to the success of this essential service.
By introducing "skin in the game" at every level, we can move away from a system of blame-shifting and towards one of mutual accountability. This radical shift in incentives, from a post person on their route to the minister in Whitehall, is the only way to ensure that the Royal Mail once again delivers on its promise to serve the public.
How to Build Profitable Businesses from Human Desires and Fears
Business at its core is about solving problems or fulfilling desires. If we look closely, many profitable industries are built on deep-rooted human instincts: lust, beauty, fear, health, education, and the desire for wealth. By understanding these drivers, we can design business models that not only attract customers but also generate long-term profits. Below are six fundamental areas, each with at least five concrete business ideas you can build on.
1. Men’s Lust
Throughout history, men’s pursuit of attraction has driven entire industries. Ethical and smart businesses can tap into this instinct while offering value.
Dating apps with premium matchmaking – tiered services for serious relationships.
Low-cost franchising opportunities – scalable small businesses.
Conclusion
The easiest ways to make money often come from the timeless desires and fears of humanity. Whether it’s love, beauty, health, education, security, or wealth, these drivers are universal and enduring. A successful entrepreneur recognizes these instincts and creates ethical, scalable solutions that people are eager to pay for.
The Global Demographic Shift: A Look at the Next Twenty Years
The ongoing global demographic shift—marked by falling birth rates, increasing life expectancy, and a rapidly aging population—is set to have a profound and lasting impact on the world over the next two decades.3This trend, while varying in pace and severity across different regions, will reshape economies, societies, and geopolitics.4 The most significant impacts will be felt in countries that are aging rapidly, such as Japan, Germany, and China, but the consequences will be global.
Economic Impacts
The most direct economic consequence is a shrinking working-age population.5As the proportion of older, retired individuals grows, the ratio of workers to retirees (known as the dependency ratio) will decline.6This puts a significant strain on social security and pension systems, as a smaller pool of workers must support a larger population of retirees.7It also leads to labor shortages, which can slow economic growth and productivity.8 To mitigate this, many nations are considering increasing the retirement age, encouraging greater labor force participation among older adults, and embracing automation and technology.
The shift will also change consumption and investment patterns. As populations age, there will be greater demand for healthcare, senior living, and elder care services, while demand for goods and services related to youth and family life may stagnate.9 This requires a reorientation of economic resources and a potential restructuring of entire industries. The increase in healthcare costs, in particular, will place immense pressure on government budgets.10
Social Impacts
Socially, the aging trend will challenge traditional family structures and social safety nets.11With fewer children, the historical role of the family as the primary caregiver for the elderly is weakening.12 This places a greater burden on public and private care systems, which are often ill-equipped to handle the growing demand for long-term care. The potential for social isolation among the elderly is also a growing concern.13
Conversely, an older population also brings potential benefits.14 Many older adults remain active, healthy, and economically productive, contributing through work, volunteering, and caregiving for grandchildren. Their accumulated knowledge and experience can be a valuable asset. The challenge lies in creating social structures and policies that recognize and support these contributions, rather than viewing aging solely as a burden.15
Geopolitical Impacts
On a geopolitical level, demographic shifts will alter the balance of power. Countries with rapidly aging and shrinking populations, such as Russia and China, may face long-term challenges in maintaining their economic and military strength. A smaller workforce and a larger dependent population can limit a nation's capacity for innovation and growth.
Meanwhile, countries with younger, growing populations, particularly in parts of Africa and South Asia, may experience a "demographic dividend"—a period of accelerated economic growth fueled by a large working-age population. However, this potential can only be realized if these nations make significant investments in education, health, and infrastructure to provide meaningful employment opportunities for their youth. This disparity in demographic profiles could lead to increased migration from younger, developing nations to older, developed ones, creating both opportunities and challenges for international relations and domestic policy.16