Pillars of the Rice Trade: The Central Role of Overseas Chinese and the "Five Great Rice Mills" in Vietnam

---

The Golden Grain of Indochina

Introduction

During the French colonial period in the early 20th century, Vietnam emerged as one of the world's leading rice exporters. This economic miracle was not driven by French capital alone but was fundamentally underpinned by the entrepreneurial spirit and organizational prowess of the Overseas Chinese. As recorded in Chen Tianjie’s memoirs, the Chinese community in Cholon (Ti'an) established a near-monopoly on the collection, processing, and exportation of Vietnamese rice, centered around the legendary "Five Great Rice Mills."

The Strategic Hub: Cholon and the Rice Network

Cholon served as the beating heart of the Vietnamese rice trade. Chinese merchants leveraged their deep connections with local Vietnamese farmers in the Mekong Delta to create a sophisticated supply chain.

• Collection: Chinese "paddy brokers" traveled into the interior to purchase raw grain from farmers.

• Transportation: A fleet of small boats and barges owned by Chinese merchants transported the paddy via the intricate canal system to the mills in Cholon.

• Processing: This is where the "Fire Rice Mills" (steam-powered mills) played a decisive role, turning raw paddy into polished export-grade rice.

The "Five Great Rice Mills" (Fire Rice Mills)

The term "Fire Rice Mill" (火米機) referred to the large-scale steam-powered milling facilities that revolutionized production. The industry was dominated by five major mills, all owned by prominent Chinese figures, representing the pinnacle of Chinese industrial investment in Nanyang at the time:

1. Ban Hap (萬合): Owned by the famous merchant Zhao Shanyuan (also known as the "Rice King").

2. Ban Seng (萬成): Another pillar of the Zhao family's industrial empire.

3. Kien Seng (建成): A major facility contributing to the massive daily output of Cholon.

4. Chung Hap (松合): Known for its high-efficiency processing capabilities.

5. Ban An (萬安): Part of the interconnected web of the "Five Greats" that dictated market prices.

These mills were not just factories; they were symbols of economic sovereignty. Their combined output was so vast that they controlled the price of rice across Southeast Asia, often out-competing French-owned mills through superior management and lower overhead costs.

Quotable Quotes on the Rice Industry

"The lifeblood of Vietnam’s economy was in the hands of the Chinese rice merchants... without the 'Five Great Rice Mills,' the export of Annam’s grain would have ground to a halt."

"The smoke from the 'Fire Rice Mills' in Cholon was the smoke of prosperity for the entire Chinese community in Indochina."

Conclusion

The dominance of the Overseas Chinese in the rice industry demonstrated their indispensable role in the modernization of Vietnam’s economy. The "Five Great Rice Mills" remain a testament to a time when Chinese capital and labor transformed Vietnam into the "Rice Bowl of Asia."

---

The Rise and Relative Decline of the UK in World GDP – An Economic History since 1800

 The Rise and Relative Decline of the UK in World GDP – An Economic History since 1800

Over the past two centuries, the United Kingdom has moved from being the world’s leading industrial power to a large but mid‑sized economy in global GDP terms. Measured as a share of world output, Britain’s position peaked in the late 19th century and then gradually eroded as industrialisation spread and new powers—especially the United States, Germany, Japan, and later China—rose. The turning point in this long‑run story lies not in a single year, but in the period from the 1870s to the 1914, when Britain’s share of global GDP began a sustained, secular decline.

Britain’s golden age, 1800–1870

At the start of the 19th century, Britain was the first nation to industrialise and quickly became the “workshop of the world.” By the 1870s, it accounted for roughly 9–10% of global GDP and an even larger share of global manufacturing output (around 22–23%). During this phase, the UK’s gap with other economies was widening: its share of world GDP was growing faster than that of continental Europe, the United States, and Asia.

This golden age rested on several pillars: coal‑powered industry, a large colonial and maritime empire, a relatively open trade regime, and early leadership in railways, textiles, and engineering. For students of economic history, this period looks like a classic case of first‑mover advantage in industrialisation, where Britain captured a disproportionate slice of global income before others caught up.

The turning point: 1870–1914

From the 1870s onward, Britain’s share of world GDP stopped rising and then began to fall. By 1913, the UK’s share of global GDP had slipped to around 8–9%, while its share of global manufacturing had fallen to about 13–14%. This marks the key turning point: the moment when catch‑up by the United States and Germany started to outweigh Britain’s own growth.

Several forces converged:

• The Second Industrial Revolution (steel, chemicals, electricity, mass production) took root faster in the US and Germany than in Britain, where older industries and institutions were slower to adapt.​

• Rising protectionism and imperial competition pushed trade patterns away from the relatively free‑trade order Britain had championed in the mid‑19th century.​

• The burden of empire and military spending began to weigh more heavily on public finances and investment choices.​

From an economic‑history standpoint, 1870–1914 is when Britain’s relative gap in global GDP peaked and then began its long descent.

The interwar and post‑1945 era

The two world wars accelerated the decline in Britain’s global weight. The costs of fighting, the loss of overseas assets, and the erosion of sterling’s role as the dominant global currency all chipped away at the UK’s share of world output. By the mid‑20th century, Britain’s share of global GDP had fallen into the low‑single‑digit percentages, even though the economy itself continued to grow in absolute terms.

In the post‑1945 period, deindustrialisation, the end of empire, and the rise of the United States and later East Asia further compressed Britain’s global footprint. By the 1970s, the UK’s share of world manufacturing output had dropped to around 5%, and its share of global GDP hovered near 4–5% in nominal terms.​

Recent decades: consolidation rather than recovery

Since the 1980s, the UK has remained a large, highly globalised economy, but its share of world GDP has stabilised rather than rebounded. Recent World Bank data show the UK accounting for about 3.2–3.5% of world GDP in current‑dollar terms, with purchasing‑power‑adjusted shares around 2.0–2.2%. In other words, Britain is now a top‑ten economy in size, but no longer a dominant global power in income terms.

From an economic‑history perspective, the long‑run trend since 1800 is clear: Britain’s gap as a share of global GDP first widened, then peaked around 1870–1913, and has since narrowed steadily as the world economy diversified and industrialised. The turning point is best understood not as a sudden crash, but as the moment when catch‑up by other industrial powers began to outpace Britain’s own growth.