Urban Craftsmen and Collective Protest in the Late Ming–Early Qing: A Socio‑Economic Reappraisal
Urban China in the late Ming and early Qing witnessed a surge of collective protest actions led by craftsmen—particularly in major commercial centers such as Suzhou and Jingdezhen. These movements were not isolated eruptions of anger but deeply rooted in structural economic pressures, evolving labor relations, and the emergence of early worker organizations. By examining these protests through economic, social, and political lenses, a clearer picture emerges of how craftsmen navigated a rapidly changing world.
Economic Pressures and the Spark of Protest
The late Ming economy was marked by inflation, fluctuating silver‑to‑copper ratios, and rising living costs. Craftsmen—especially weavers and textile workers in Suzhou—were highly vulnerable to these shifts. When wages stagnated while prices soared, tensions intensified.
The situation worsened when imperial tax policies empowered eunuch‑supervised mining and tax offices to extract levies from local industries. These policies disrupted commercial networks and placed heavy burdens on artisans and merchants. In Suzhou, the combination of high silk prices, aggressive tax collection, and declining purchasing power triggered large‑scale unrest. Workers who depended on daily wages found themselves unable to survive, leading to organized resistance.
The Rise of Worker Organization
By the late Ming, craftsmen had begun forming rudimentary associations. These early groups were not formal guilds but loose alliances based on shared workplaces, neighborhoods, or trades. By the early Qing, these alliances had grown into more structured, union‑like organizations capable of mobilizing thousands of workers.
Although the government prohibited the establishment of independent guild halls, craftsmen still developed networks that facilitated communication, coordinated strikes, and provided mutual support. These organizations played a crucial role in transforming spontaneous anger into collective action.
Rituals, Symbols, and Collective Mentality
Craftsmen’s protests were not merely economic—they were cultural performances. Workers used symbolic gestures, oaths, and ritualized actions to express solidarity and moral legitimacy. These rituals reflected a transformation of elite cultural forms into tools of popular resistance.
Protesters often emphasized moral righteousness, vowing not to steal or harm innocents. Such declarations helped maintain discipline and framed their struggle as a defense of community justice rather than rebellion.
From Violence to Legal Appeals
A notable shift occurred from the late Ming to the early Qing: craftsmen increasingly turned to legal channels. Instead of relying solely on violent uprisings, workers began submitting petitions, reporting abusive employers, and demanding wage adjustments through official mediation.
This evolution suggests a growing awareness of legal rights and a strategic use of state institutions to negotiate labor disputes.
Government Response: More Than Repression
Contrary to the common assumption that Qing authorities always sided with employers, historical evidence shows a more nuanced picture. Officials often acted as mediators, balancing the interests of workers and employers to maintain social stability.
While violent uprisings were suppressed, peaceful negotiations were frequently encouraged. In many cases, officials intervened to adjust wages, regulate workshops, or punish exploitative employers.
Conclusion
The collective protests of urban craftsmen in the late Ming and early Qing were products of economic hardship, evolving labor structures, and emerging worker consciousness. These movements reveal a dynamic urban society where workers were not passive victims but active agents shaping their economic and social environment. Their actions laid early foundations for more organized labor relations in later centuries.
發表文章
