顯示具有 Knowledge 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 Knowledge 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2025年10月5日 星期日

Distinguishing Facts, Truth, and Information

 

Distinguishing Facts, Truth, and Information

While often used interchangeably, factstruth, and information represent distinct concepts, especially when examined closely in philosophy, law, and data management.


Facts vs. Truth

The main difference lies in their nature: a fact is an objective, verifiable reality, whereas truth is often a more subjective, philosophical concept—a property of a claim or belief that aligns with reality or an accepted standard.

AspectFactTruth
NatureObjective, indisputable, concrete reality. Exists independent of belief.Subjective or universal concept, often a property of a proposition or belief.
VerifiabilityCan be proven or verified through evidence, measurement, or demonstration.Refers to the state or quality of being in accordance with reality or an accepted standard.
ChangeDoes not change (or only changes if the physical reality changes).Can be more fluid, influenced by perspective, belief, or context.
RelationshipFacts are what make a statement or proposition true.Truth is the quality of a statement or belief that corresponds to facts.

Examples

CategoryFactTruth (a true proposition or belief)
ScienceWater boils at  at standard atmospheric pressure."It is true that 100C is the boiling point of water" (A claim about the fact).
HistoryWorld War II ended in 1945.The historical truth is that the war caused immense suffering (A broader, accepted reality informed by facts).
PersonalI have a headache right now. (Can be verified by brain scans or self-reporting).Honesty is the best policy. (A value or principle, accepted as a general 'truth' by many).
ObservationThe car is red. (A verifiable observation).The red car is beautiful. (A subjective claim/belief that is "true" to the speaker).

Why We Say "The Truth" in Court

In a legal setting, witnesses are sworn to tell "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth." This choice of wording emphasizes a greater scope than simply listing a few facts:

  • Seeking Substantive Truth: A trial's goal is to establish the substantive truth—the actual reality of what happened—based on the evidence presented. It's not just about a collection of isolated facts, but the coherence and completeness of a witness's account in relation to the event.

  • Beyond Isolated Facts: "The truth" encompasses a person's full and honest account, including their perspective, recollection, and intent. A witness could state a fact (e.g., "The light was green") but omit another critical fact (e.g., "I ran the green light while texting"), which would render their testimony untruthful.

  • A Property of Statements: From a philosophical perspective, truth is a property of a statement, assertion, or proposition. When a witness swears to tell "the truth," they are promising that the statements they make will conform to reality (the facts) as they know it. Swearing on a set of independent facts (like "The Earth is round") would be meaningless; they are swearing on the veracity of their claims.

  • The Burden of Proof: Ultimately, the court combines the testimonial truths and proven facts to reach a formal legal truth, which is a finding of fact based on the legal standard of proof (e.g., beyond a reasonable doubt).


Information vs. Facts

Information and facts relate to each other in a hierarchical way, often illustrated by the Data-Information-Knowledge hierarchy. A fact can be a unit of information, but information is typically processed, organized, or contextualized data/facts.

AspectFactInformation
DefinitionA specific, verifiable, and objective datum or reality.Processed, organized, or structured data/facts that convey context and meaning.
ContextLacks inherent context on its own.Provides context and answers "who, what, where, and when."
RelationshipRaw building blocks; a single verifiable data point.A meaningful collection and presentation of facts.

Examples

CategoryFact (Raw Data)Information (Contextualized Facts)
Measurement37.5 (A number)The patient's temperature is , which is normal. (Fact + context)
Sales1,000 units (A number)Sales increased by 1,000 units in the second quarter due to the new marketing campaign. (Fact + context + analysis)
Location40.7128N,74.0060W(Raw coordinates)The accident occurred in New York City at the intersection of two major streets. (Facts + meaning)



2025年6月11日 星期三

What Exactly Is Philosophy?

What Exactly Is Philosophy?

When you hear "philosophy," you might imagine people sitting around, thinking deep thoughts, and using confusing words. But actually, philosophy is quite relevant to our lives, and philosophers use some pretty cool ways of thinking!

Philosophy: Big Questions, No Single Answer

What is philosophy? That's a philosophical question in itself, because there's no single answer everyone agrees on. But let's look at what some famous philosophers have said to get a better idea:

  • Sellars' Idea: He believed philosophy aims to connect two ways we see the world. One is the scientific view (like how a table is mostly empty space made of atoms). The other is our everyday experience (a table feels solid). Philosophers try to make these two pictures "fit together harmoniously," so our understanding of the world is more complete.
  • Wittgenstein's Idea: He thought many philosophical problems come from us being "confused." This confusion might be about language or just getting "stuck in a mental loop." Philosophers are like guides who "help a fly out of a fly-bottle." They clear up the confusion, and once things are clear, the problem often just disappears or becomes super simple.
  • John Stuart Mill's Idea: He compared language to the "air" of philosophical study. He said we need to make this air "transparent" to see the truth. This means philosophers often clarify the words and concepts we use. Many problems seem hard only because we don't fully understand the terms we're using. Once we do, the solution becomes clear!

So, Is Philosophy About Avoiding Thinking Traps?

You could say philosophy is like "mental self-defense," teaching you how to "avoid falling into thinking traps." Some ways we think or reason might feel intuitive and right, but they're actually wrong. Philosophy's job is to find and explain these "traps." That way, you won't keep making the same mistakes. So, when a scientific problem seems to be leading you into a thinking trap based on how you're asking or thinking about it, that's when it becomes a philosophical problem too!


How Do Philosophers Think (Their "Superpowers")?

Philosophers aren't just sitting there daydreaming. They use some powerful thinking tools and methods:

  • Logic and Reasoning: This is a philosopher's basic skill! They study how to think and reason correctly. From ancient Aristotle's "syllogisms" (like "If A is B, and B is C, then A is C") to modern types of logic, philosophers explore it all. Good logic makes your thinking clear and strong.
  • Spotting Fallacies: Philosophers teach you how to find reasoning that sounds good but is actually wrong.
    • Example: The "affirming the consequent" fallacy is common. For instance: "If it rains, the ground gets wet. The ground is wet, so it must have rained." This isn't necessarily true; someone could have poured water! Philosophers help you spot these "thinking holes" so you're not fooled by shaky arguments.
  • Clarifying Language (Disambiguation): Philosophers will carefully untangle all the different meanings a single word might have.
    • Example: When discussing "consciousness," the word can mean many things. Philosophers might separate "biological consciousness" (if an animal is aware) from "consciousness of a specific state" (like being aware of seeing the color red). This way, everyone knows exactly what they're talking about, avoiding confusion.
  • Conceptual Analysis: Philosophers dig deep to understand the "essence" of a concept.
    • Example: What is "knowledge"? We use this word daily, but what's its true nature? Philosophers analyze it, defining it as "justified true belief" (meaning you believe something, it's true, and you have good reasons to believe it). While this definition is now considered more complex, it's a classic example of how philosophers analyze concepts. It's like asking "What do you mean by 'water'?" before studying its chemical nature (H2O).
  • Thought Experiments: Philosophers love using hypothetical scenarios to help them think and challenge common assumptions.
    • "Mary the Neuroscientist" Thought Experiment:
      • Imagine Mary, a neuroscientist, who lives in a black-and-white room and has never seen color.
      • But she knows everything about color perception – all the physics, chemistry, and biology down to the molecular level.
      • One day, she steps out of her room and sees a red mailbox for the first time. She experiences "redness."
      • Question: Did she "learn" anything new at that moment?
      • Conclusion: Many feel she learned "what it feels like to see red," which is new knowledge. If she already knew all the physical facts, yet still learned something new, then "what it feels like to see red" isn't just a physical fact. This suggests that "phenomenal consciousness" (our subjective experience) might not be purely physical. This experiment challenges the idea that consciousness is entirely physical.

To sum it all up:

Philosophers don't just idly ponder; they use a very strict and systematic set of thinking methods. These include making language clear, finding our thinking blind spots, using strong logic, and challenging common ideas through thought experiments. These methods are super helpful for understanding complex issues like "consciousness" that cross both science and philosophy!