The Evolution of Servility: Ranking the 25 Human Archetypes by Complexity

 

The Evolution of Servility: Ranking the 25 Human Archetypes by Complexity

Liu Zaifu’s archetypes provide a roadmap of human degradation. When rearranged from simplistic (primitive/instinctual) to complex (intellectual/strategic), we see how a society moves from biological existence to a sophisticated web of manipulation and survival.

I. The Simplified Ranking (From Primitive to Complex)

1. Level 1: The Instinctual (Biological)

   • Types: Flesh Man, Animal Man, Idle Man.

   • Value: Minimal. They are mere consumers. In a functioning society, they provide labor (Animal Man) but offer no spiritual or intellectual advancement.

2. Level 2: The Reactive (Emotional/Physical)

   • Types: Fierce Man, Reckless Man, Enduring Man, Infatuated Man, Eccentric Man.

   • Value: Destructive or neutral. They react to the world with raw emotion or fear. They create chaos or suffer in silence.

3. Level 3: The Social Tools (Systemic)

   • Types: Puppet Man, Man in a Shell, Nodding Man, Vulgar Man, Frivolous Man.

   • Value: High utility for the state, low value for humanity. They maintain the status quo and provide the "grease" for social machinery through compliance.

4. Level 4: The Strategic Parasites (Intellectual/Ego)

   • Types: Cynic, Sour Man, Eunuch Man, Slanderer, Parsimonious Man, Clever Man.

   • Value: Negative. They possess intelligence but use it to protect their ego or tear down others.

5. Level 5: The Architects of Malice (Complex/Deep)

   • Types: Slaughterer, Accomplice Man, Shadow Man.

   • Value: Dangerous. These are the "brains" behind systemic evil, manipulating reality and people with high-level calculation.

6. Level 6: The Transcendental (Self-Aware)

   • Types: The Last Man, The Crevice Man.

   • Value: The Last Man represents the tragic end of complexity (fatigue), while The Crevice Man is the only one with true value—preserving wisdom and integrity within the gaps of a broken system.

---

II. The Totalitarian End Game

In a totalitarian society, the state acts as the ultimate "Sculptor" of these types. The goal is to eliminate Complexity and Integrity (The Crevice Man) and maximize Utility and Predictability.

• Phase 1: Standardization. The state turns everyone into Puppet Men and Nodding Men. Independent thought is replaced by the "Shell."

• Phase 2: Use and Discard. The Accomplice Men and Shadow Men are used to purge the Fierce Men (uncontrolled power). Once the purge is over, the Accomplices are themselves "slaughtered" to ensure no one is smarter than the Centre.

• Phase 3: The Human Livestock. The final goal is a society of Animal Men and Flesh Men—content, fed, and mindless—overseen by a few Eunuch Men who have traded their souls for the privilege of holding the whip.

What Is a Leninist Country? Definition, Characteristics, and a Comparison of China and the UK

 

What Is a Leninist Country? Definition, Characteristics, and a Comparison of China and the UK

What does “Leninist” mean?

A Leninist country is a state whose political system is based on the ideas of Vladimir Lenin, particularly his theory of how power should be organized and exercised in a modern state. Leninism is not simply “socialism” or “communism”; it refers specifically to a method of political organization and governance.

At its core, Leninism emphasizes centralized political authority, a vanguard party, and the belief that the state must actively guide society toward a defined ideological goal.

---

Key characteristics of a Leninist country

Most scholars agree that a Leninist system typically includes the following features:

1. A single dominant ruling party
   Political power is monopolized by one party that claims to represent the long-term interests of the people.

2. The vanguard party concept
   The ruling party sees itself as an enlightened elite that leads society, rather than competing equally with other parties.

3. Democratic centralism
   Internal discussion may exist, but once decisions are made at the top, lower levels must strictly comply.

4. Fusion of party and state
   Party leadership overrides or directs government institutions, courts, military, and media.

5. Ideological legitimacy
   The ruling party justifies its authority through an official ideology, not through regular electoral competition alone.

6. Limited political pluralism
   Opposition parties, if allowed at all, do not have a realistic path to governing power.

---

Is present-day China a Leninist country?

Yes — China is widely regarded by political scientists as a modern Leninist state, though with important adaptations.

• The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is the sole ruling party.

• The CCP explicitly follows Marxism–Leninism, adapted as “Socialism with Chinese Characteristics.”

• Party leadership stands above the state, the courts, the military, and major media.

• Political pluralism is tightly restricted.

• Market economics exist, but political power remains Leninist in structure.

In short, China combines Leninist political control with non-Leninist economic mechanisms.

---

Is the United Kingdom a Leninist country?

No — the UK is not a Leninist country, nor is it close.

Key differences include:

• Multi-party competitive elections with peaceful transfer of power

• Clear separation between political parties and the state

• Independent judiciary and media

• No official ideology enforced by the state

• Opposition parties can and do form governments

While the UK has strong institutions and party discipline, these operate within a pluralist democratic framework, not a Leninist one.

---

How close are China and the UK to Leninism?

• China: Very close — it retains the core structural features of Leninism.

• UK: Very distant — its system is fundamentally incompatible with Leninist principles.

---

Conclusion

A Leninist country is defined not by culture or economics, but by how political power is organized, justified, and enforced.
Understanding Leninism helps clarify why states that may look economically similar can be politically very different.