顯示具有 WGEA 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 WGEA 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2026年3月13日 星期五

澳洲「官場現形記」:當公務員成了不折不扣的「貴族階級」

 

澳洲「官場現形記」:當公務員成了不折不扣的「貴族階級」

歷史告訴我們一個不變的真理:離印鈔機越近的人,口袋通常就越厚。米爾頓·傅利曼(Milton Friedman)曾說,世界上最沒效率的事就是「花別人的錢在別人身上」。但他少算了一種更精明的情況:官僚體系最擅長的,其實是「花別人的錢在自己身上」。

澳洲「職場性別平等機構」(WGEA)最近發布的年度報告,本意是要站在道德高地,指點私人企業如何縮小男女薪資差距。誰知道這塊遮羞布一掀開,反而讓全澳洲人看清了一個荒謬的現實:聯邦政府已經悄悄建立起一個「官僚貴族圈」,其優渥程度足以讓私人企業的打工仔集體崩潰。

看看那個名字聽起來很環保的「清潔能源融資公司」(CEFC)。這間機構裡,薪水「最低」的四分之一員工,平均年薪竟然高達 $137,000。這是什麼概念?澳洲全職勞工的中位數年薪才約 $74,700。換句話說,你在這間公司掃地(誇張點說),薪水都已經贏過全澳洲九成的勞動人口。更別提「未來基金」(Future Fund)的高層,平均年薪高達 $560,000。這哪裡是在服務公眾?這是在公帑堆出來的象牙塔裡過神仙日子。

面對質疑,官方的藉口永遠是那一套:「我們必須支付市場價格,才能從投資銀行挖角人才。」然而,從歷史的角度看,當國家開始模仿市場的奢華,卻又不需承擔市場的破產風險時,這個政府就不再是服務者,而是個「合法壟斷的壟斷集團」。阿爾巴尼斯政府老是拿低失業率說嘴,卻從不提醒大家,這些就業增長有多少是靠擴張公家機關、吸納稅金來豢養自己人。

當古羅馬開始給予近衛軍遠超軍團的待遇時,帝國的崩潰也就進入倒數了。今天的澳洲雖然沒有近衛軍,卻有一群享有 15.4% 退休金供款、薪資比私人企業高出 11% 以上的公務精英。這真是最完美的商業模式:沒有競爭壓力,預算無限上綱,而這群負責監管經濟的人,領得比真正創造經濟的人還要多。傅利曼說得對,花別人的錢,果然一點都不心疼。


The Great Australian Heist: When "Public Service" Becomes a Private Club

 

The Great Australian Heist: When "Public Service" Becomes a Private Club

History teaches us that the closer you are to the printing press, the fatter your wallet becomes. Milton Friedman famously noted that the most inefficient way to spend money is spending "other people’s money on other people." But he missed a nuance: spending other people’s money on oneself is the pinnacle of bureaucratic evolution.

The latest Workplace Gender Equality Agency (WGEA) report in Australia was supposed to be a lecture on social justice—a way to shame the private sector into balancing the scales between men and women. Instead, it accidentally pulled back the curtain on a far more cynical reality: the Australian federal government has created a "Bureaucratic Aristocracy" that makes the private sector look like a charity ward.

Take the Clean Energy Finance Corporation (CEFC). Their lowest-paid 25% of staff earn an average of $137,000. To put that in perspective, that’s nearly double the national median income. In the halls of the CEFC, being "bottom of the barrel" puts you in the top 10% of the Australian workforce. And don’t even get me started on the Future Fund, where the top quartile earns an average of $560,000. That’s not a public service salary; that’s a "lottery winner" stipend, funded by the very taxpayers who earn five times less.

The excuse is always the same: "We have to pay market rates to attract talent from investment banks." Yet, history shows that when the state begins to mimic the excesses of the market without the market's risk of bankruptcy, you are no longer a government—you are a protected cartel. The Albanese government boasts of low unemployment, but they conveniently forget to mention that a huge chunk of that "growth" is just the public sector cannibalizing the treasury to hire more of their own.

When the Romans started paying the Praetorian Guard more than the legions, the Empire’s days were numbered. Today, we don’t have Praetorians; we have statutory authorities with 15.4% superannuation. It’s the ultimate business model: zero competition, infinite funding, and a workforce that gets paid more to regulate the economy than the people who actually build it.