2025年3月14日 星期五

康禮《情愫算術》Chip Conley,Emotional Equations: Simple Truths for Creating Happiness + Success

 

甲乙對話:論康禮《情愫算術》

甲: 聞君近日讀康禮新著《情愫算術》Chip Conley,Emotional Equations: Simple Truths for Creating Happiness + Success,頗有心得,可否與我詳述一二?

乙: 然也。康禮此書,以算術之法,解構人生情愫,甚為精妙。其中有三式,尤令我深思。

甲: 願聞其詳。

乙: 其一,絕望等於苦痛減去意義(絕望 = 苦痛 - 意義)。康禮引維克多·弗蘭克爾之言,謂苦痛乃人生之常數,而意義則為變數。若能於苦痛之中尋得意義,則絕望自可消減。

甲: 此言甚是。人生在世,難免遭遇苦難,若能從中汲取教訓,則苦痛亦可轉化為成長之養分。

乙: 其二,焦慮等於不確定性乘以無力感(焦慮 = 不確定性 × 無力感)。康禮教人製作焦慮平衡表,將已知、未知、可控、不可控之事一一列舉,以釐清思緒。若能增加已知與可控之部分,則焦慮自可減輕。

甲: 此法甚妙。焦慮往往源於對未知之恐懼,若能將其具體化,則可減輕其影響。

乙: 其三,幸福等於想要汝所擁有者除以擁有汝所想要者(幸福 = 想要汝所擁有者 / 擁有汝所想要者)。康禮以不丹之國民幸福指數為例,謂幸福並非一味追求更多,而是珍惜當下所擁有。若能常懷感恩之心,則幸福自可常伴左右。

甲: 此言發人深省。世人多汲汲營營於追求外物,卻忽略了身邊之美好。殊不知,幸福往往就在於珍惜當下。

乙: 誠如君言。康禮此書,以簡約之算式,揭示人生之真諦,實為值得一讀之佳作。

甲: 吾亦欲拜讀此書,以期能從中獲益。


Chip Conley's book "Emotional Equations: Simple Truths for Creating Happiness + Success":

Regret = Disappointment + Responsibility

Jealousy = Mistrust / Self-Esteem

Envy = (Pride + Vanity) / Kindness

Anxiety = Uncertainty x Powerlessness

Despair = Suffering - Meaning

Disappointment = Expectations - Reality

Calling = Pleasure / Pain

Workaholism = What Are You Running From? / What Are You Living For?

Flow = Skill / Challenge

Curiosity = Wonder + Awe

Authenticity = Self-Awareness x Courage

Narcissism = (Self-Esteem)^2 x Entitlement

Integrity = Authenticity x Invisibility x Reliability

Happiness = Wanting What You Have / Having What You Want

Joy = Love - Fear

Thriving = Frequency of Positive / Frequency of Negative

Faith = Belief / Intellect

Wisdom = Square Root of Experience

Innovation = Creativity - Cynicism

Event + Reaction = Outcome

Suffering = Pain x Resistance

Emotion = Energy + Motion

Emotions = Life

Gravity (Emotional Baggage): Conceptualized as a force that affects emotional selves, similar to physical gravity

All This Fuss About Food, If You Ask Me...

 

All This Fuss About Food, If You Ask Me...

Right then, I've had a look at this piece about all the fuss people are making over food these days. Seems a bit much, doesn't it? Used to be, you just ate what was put in front of you and got on with it. Now, it's all fancy-dan dishes and showing off about what you've got on your plate. More bothered about how it looks, I shouldn't wonder, than if it actually tastes any good.

This piece here talks about how people used to have their priorities straight – valuing what's right and proper, not just chasing after the latest fad. They ate to fuel themselves, plain and simple. Now? It's all about the image and the expense. It's a wonder anyone has any time left for anything else with all this preoccupation with what they're eating.

And the world we live in doesn't help matters, does it? Adverts on the telly and in the papers constantly telling you that you need the latest gourmet whatever. It's a right old carry-on, if you ask me. Common sense seems to have gone out the window in favour of the next food craze.

They've even got a name for these folks: "food people". Suits them, I suppose. So caught up in gorging themselves and then boasting about it that they've lost sight of what's truly important. More interested in the newest culinary trend than, well, anything of real substance.

And it's not doing them any favours, this constant stuffing and guzzling. Feeling poorly, putting on weight, the whole shebang. And what about their character? Always wanting more, never content, just chasing the next tasty morsel. Doesn't sound like a recipe for a happy life, does it?

So, what's the answer to all this? According to this piece, it's about getting back to basics. Being sensible with your money, not being wasteful, and valuing what's right over what's fashionable. The media needs to buck up its ideas too, not just pushing the latest food nonsense. And maybe we all need to learn a bit more about what's actually good for us, instead of just following the crowd like sheep.

This whole obsession with posh nosh and eating like there's no tomorrow seems to be a sign of something not quite right in the world. We've gone a bit off track, haven't we? Perhaps it's time we all just had a nice, straightforward meal and thought about the things that truly matter. Before we all turn into these overstuffed "food people" with more problems than we started with.

器械華麗,傭工賤價?理不通也!

 


器械華麗,傭工賤價?理不通也!

吾讀麥肯錫公司之報告,謂商賈於人力之費,乃器械樓宇之三倍。三倍也!理應視其人如金玉,非耶?以為其人乃造香腸者,非僅香腸機之齒輪也。

然則不然,其所為者何?視勞力為「可削減之成本」。若漏水之龍頭,欲緊之以節數滴。譬如購駿馬,而怨草料之價。馬乃競賽之本也!

此實不合常理。縱有嶄新之電腦,自動之工廠,然出謀劃策者、解決難題者、實踐運作之者,皆人也。彼等器械,豈能自思乎?至少今未然,若觀彼等人工智慧之廣告,或更添煩擾。

此令吾憶及購廉價之物。初覺節省,然則一週即壞,終需費更多以更換。視僱員為可棄之費,亦似短視之舉。短期或可節省工資,然則頻繁招募培訓新人之費何如?當受輕視之人離去,其所攜之知識又何如?

此「人才回報最大化」之論,於吾而言,乃常識也。若於人力費巨資,豈不欲盡其用乎?此非僅望其現身行事而已。乃投資於其技藝,傾聽其見解,使其覺為其中一員也。

憶林肯電氣公司*之士乎?彼等厚待其工,其果如何?得驚人之生產力。非華麗之口號,亦非激勵之海報,乃認可勞動者之價值也。

或彼等商賈應效仿之。勿視其僱員為可擠壓削減之賬目數字,應視其為真正之資產。蓋無良工之商賈,若有華麗菜單而無廚師之餐廳,徒有其表,而無實質。彼等華麗之資本設備,豈能自行運轉乎?




*林肯之恆久經營智慧——製造業成功典範之經理啟示

詹姆斯·奧圖爾著,二零一三年八月二十六日

(原刊於博思公司)

雖近期復甦,然美國工業基礎衰落之論,屢見報端,致使美國經理人專注於當日新聞及當季業績。故鮮有人汲取美國最長久之製造業成功典範之寶貴教訓。近百年來,林肯電氣公司始終位列美國生產力最高之製造企業,六十餘年未曾裁撤一名正式員工,七十五年來,員工紅利平均為年薪之六至十成。然國內竟無他企採用林肯電氣之獨特體系,此體系令股東、經理及員工皆有強烈動機,協作以滿足顧客需求,延續成功。

一九一一年,詹姆斯·林肯創立林肯電氣公司,至今仍為世界最大電弧焊機製造商。今林肯電氣已為市值二十九億美元之跨國企業,雄踞全球市場。林肯早年洞見深刻:「吾知若能使公司上下皆欲如吾般成功,則無難題不可共解。」林肯雖為堅定之資本家,然覺華爾街之短期指令乃體系之最大威脅。其書曰:「今以股東利益運營產業之策,實不合理……尋常之不在場股東,於效率毫無貢獻。彼等朝買暮賣,多不知公司所產何物。」故林肯力求公司股票由經理及員工掌控。

林肯信奉經營之道,在於以最低價格生產最高品質之產品,服務顧客。而實現此目標之途,乃使全體員工參與其中。為使參與成真,林肯創立包含四項要素之組織體系:

一、溝通與參與。林肯信人受尊重,得機會發展及運用其才幹,則受激勵。其予員工查閱管理數據之權,鼓勵其尋求提高生產力及效率之法。近百年來,民選員工顧問委員會每兩週與林肯高層會晤,管理層與員工共同決策公司發展方向,包括海外擴張製造業務。管理層保留否決權,然因管理層與員工利益一致,故從未行使。

二、計件工資。林肯之製造工人非按時、週、資歷計酬。管理層與員工協商客觀標準,按實際產出計酬,多產多得。基本工資與當地工會工人持平,然林肯工人收入無上限,且可自主管理,自由組織生產方式。

三、績效獎金。公司三分之一利潤以獎金形式發放給生產工人,依其產出、品質、適應性、可靠性、團隊合作、創意、協作及遵守環境、健康、安全標準而定。二零一一年,美國林肯工人平均年收入約八萬美元。

四、保障就業。服務滿三年之生產工人,保證每週至少工作三十小時,以換取產品需求旺盛時加班。二零零八至零九年經濟衰退期,公司被迫實行三十小時工作制,然通常工人每週工作五十五小時。為履行保障就業之承諾,工人同意調任不同崗位,甚至低薪崗位。經濟低迷時,管理層及薪酬員工減薪,其職責轉為尋求使計時工人恢復全職之法。林肯各級員工皆言:「吾等同舟共濟。」

此體系基於數十年來,公司在順境逆境中皆堅守其道所積累之信任與社群感。此帶來之益處,乃對俄亥俄州克利夫蘭林肯工廠周邊社區之積極影響。縱使該市遭遇鐵鏽帶地區之命運,林肯員工亦為本將被棄之社區提供社會及經濟支撐。今林肯電氣作為俄亥俄州最大出口商,仍為克利夫蘭困境中之亮點。

公司持續發展、創新,獲穩定利潤(二零一二年銷售額二十九億美元,利潤二億五千七百萬美元)。然近年有二事變更。雖公司股票多數仍由員工及林肯家族基金會持有,然公司於一九九五年上市,在納斯達克交易之股份比例日益增長。同時,公司多數增長來自海外,常在法律禁止實行林肯獨特僱傭制度之國家。林肯電氣能否在這些變化下,延續詹姆斯·林肯所創之文化,令人拭目以待。

Fancy Equipment, Cheap Help? Doesn't Add Up!

 

Fancy Equipment, Cheap Help? Doesn't Add Up!

So, I'm reading McKinsey & Company that businesses are shelling out three times more money on people than they are on all their fancy machines and buildings. Three times! You'd think they'd treat those people like gold, wouldn't you? Like they were the ones actually making the sausages, not just the cogs in the sausage-making machine.


But no, what do they do? They see labour as a 'cost to cut'. A leaky tap they need to tighten to save a few drops. It's like buying a prize-winning racehorse and then complaining about the price of the oats. The horse is the reason you're in the race in the first place!

It just doesn't make any sense. You can have the shiniest new computers and the most automated factories, but it's the people who come up with the ideas, who fix the problems, who actually make the thing work. Those machines don't think for themselves, do they? Not yet anyway, and if those AI advertisements are anything to go by, maybe that's more trouble than it's worth anyway.

It reminds me of when you buy something cheap. You think you're saving money at the time, but then it breaks down after a week, and you end up spending more in the long run replacing it. Treating your employees like a disposable expense seems like the same sort of short-sighted thinking. You might save a bit on wages in the short term, but what about the cost of constantly hiring and training new people? What about the knowledge that walks out the door when someone who feels undervalued leaves?

This idea of 'maximizing returns on talent' sounds like common sense to me. If you're spending that much money on people, wouldn't you want to get the most out of them? That means more than just expecting them to show up and do the bare minimum. It means investing in their skills, listening to their ideas, and making them feel like they're actually part of something.

Remember that fella at Lincoln Electric*? They paid their workers well, and what happened? They got incredible productivity. It wasn't about fancy slogans or motivational posters; it was about recognising the value of the people doing the work.

Maybe these businesses need to take a leaf out of that book. Stop looking at their employees as just numbers on a spreadsheet to be squeezed and trimmed. Start seeing them as the real asset they are. Because at the end of the day, a business without good people is like a restaurant with a fancy menu but no cook – it might look good on paper, but it's not going to deliver anything worthwhile. And all that fancy capital equipment isn't going to run itself, now is it?




*Lincoln Electric is a well-established and prominent company in the manufacturing sector. Here's a breakdown of what they do and how they operate:   


What Lincoln Electric Does:


Manufacturing:

Lincoln Electric is a global manufacturer of welding products, arc welding equipment, welding accessories, plasma and oxy-fuel cutting equipment, and robotic welding systems.   

Essentially, they provide the tools and technology used for joining metals.   

Global Presence:

They have a wide network of distributors and sales offices, serving customers in over 160 countries.   

They operate manufacturing locations across North America, Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and Latin America.   

Business Performance:


Established Company:

Founded in 1895, Lincoln Electric has a long and successful history.   

Publicly Traded:

They are a publicly traded company on the Nasdaq (LECO) and are a component of the S&P 400.   

Financial Success:

Lincoln Electric is a financially strong company, with billions of dollars in revenue.

How Lincoln Electric Treats Its Workers:


Performance-Based Culture:

Lincoln Electric is known for its unique performance-based culture. They have a system that rewards employees for their productivity.   

This system has historically been a key factor in their success.

Emphasis on Productivity:

They have a strong focus on employee productivity, and their compensation structure reflects this.   

Long-Term Employment:

Historically, they have had a very strong record of long term employment for their workers.   

The Lincoln Electric System:

The "Lincoln Electric System" is a well known management system that heavily relies on incentive based pay, and a strong company culture.   

In summary, Lincoln Electric is a major player in the welding industry, with a long history of success. Their approach to employee relations, particularly their performance-based system, has been a distinctive feature of their business.

闢林築道,議論樂土?

 

闢林築道,議論樂土?

噫嘻!果真耶?欲於亞馬遜雨林中,闢四車道,以便諸公往貝倫城,議氣候峰會。此實匪夷所思也。

天下領袖,號稱五萬,飛抵此地,欲論救地球之事。首行之事,竟准許一項工程,毀林中要地。譬如旱中鑿井,欲言節水。其理,吾實難解。

言其為解城中交通,以供十一月之盛會。五萬人聚於一城,必有擁堵。然氣候峰會之意,豈非思慮如何減少築路,抑制車行乎?

此令吾憶及彼等「主題餐廳」。費盡心思,擬作海盜船或飛機之形,令人忘其本為供食之所。今則耗費環境,以供諸公論環境。亞馬遜之濕熱,恐不及此諷刺之濃烈。

一旦此路既成,則永存矣。峰會既畢,豈能捲之而藏?必將引發更多車行,更多開發。

此舉實本末倒置,非耶?譬如欲節紙張,而印六份節紙備忘錄。令人撓首,疑其是否深思熟慮。或可舉行視頻會議。雖不若親臨之盛,然林木必感其惠。


https://youtu.be/DYtmc2JPIfM?si=3Cc09TK0Ch-YJnDZ

Paving Paradise for a Meeting About Paradise?

 

Paving Paradise for a Meeting About Paradise?

Well, I'll be hornswoggled. They're going to cut a four-lane highway through the Amazon rainforest so that all the important folks can get to a climate summit in Belém. You can't make this stuff up, can you?

Here we have all these world leaders, fifty thousand of 'em they say, flying in to talk about saving the planet, and the first thing they do is okay a project that tears up a chunk of one of the most important parts of it. It's like saying you're trying to save water while drilling a new well in the middle of a drought. The logic of some people just escapes me.

They say it's to ease traffic to the city, which is going to host this big conference in November. Fifty thousand people descending on a city is bound to cause a bit of a jam, I suppose. But isn't the point of a climate summit to maybe think about ways we don't have to build more roads and encourage more driving?

It reminds me a bit of when they build those "theme restaurants". They go to all sorts of trouble to make it look like a pirate ship or an airplane, and you sort of forget they're supposed to be serving you food. Here, they're going to this great environmental expense so that everyone can talk about the environment. You'd think the irony would be as thick as the humidity in the Amazon.

Once that highway's in, it's in. It's not like you can just roll it up and put it away after the summit's over. It'll be there encouraging more traffic, more development.

It all feels a bit backward, doesn't it? Like trying to save paper by sending out six copies of a memo about saving paper. You scratch your head and wonder if anyone's really thought this through. Maybe they should have just had a video conference. It might not have been as grand, but I bet the trees would have appreciated it.


https://youtu.be/DYtmc2JPIfM?si=3Cc09TK0Ch-YJnDZ