2025年3月14日 星期五

論抖音之象

 

論抖音之象:數字嬉戲與國政之應對

抖音者,奇觀也,或可謂數字嬉戲。

首論「虛無」之義。若以樂觀財政官員之視角,可謂抖音刺激經濟。蓋數據消耗需頻寬,頻寬需基建,基建需投資。故每舞步、對口型,皆間接助益國內生產總值。此詮釋或過於創新,然不可遏制經濟增長之機遇。

再論社會凝聚力。抖音以其獨特方式,或可促進社群感。眾人互聯,分享經歷(雖多經濾鏡),參與共同文化討論。此討論是否啟發智慧,另當別論。然其為討論,於此分裂之世,任何聚人之平台,縱僅觀奇異服飾,亦可謂利大於弊。

若謂國民沉迷抖音,一事無成,朝廷將何應對?此視乎政治氣候與觀感。

情景一:爭議之氣

若朝廷因生產力不足或教育水準下降而受責,必速設「社交媒體對國民產出影響調查委員會」。委員會成員,多為抖音經驗不足(然擅長撰寫冗長報告),必結論曰需進一步研究。故需撥款予「數字參與與社會影響中心」,成員多為抖音成癮之學者。研究、報告、無為之循環,由此而生。

情景二:祥和之氣

若政局相對穩定,朝廷或擁抱抖音。鼓勵大臣開設賬戶,分享精心策劃之生活片段(宜涉及園藝或讀書)。此舉將被視為「與年輕選民溝通」,展示朝廷「對數字格局之理解」。然對政策之實際影響微乎其微,僅供媒體拍照。

真實應對(及公務員之見)

終究,朝廷之真正應對,乃盡量少為。公務員將靜觀其變,或委託內部報告,論及政府僱員於外國所有之平台分享信息之潛在安全風險(此乃真實隱憂)。吾輩將擬一系列政策文件,建議「進一步監測與分析」,確保充分知情,以備不時之需。當然,此舉或無必要。善為規劃之無為之策,其妙處在於,表面積極,實則一事無成。於此案,此或為最明智之舉。干預抖音此等不可預測之物,或有……不可預見之後果。「不可預見之後果」,乃朝廷與公務員竭力避免之事。任年輕人於其小世界中舞蹈,更為穩妥。唯期其於選舉之時,負責任地投票。此乃底線也。


抖音:無聲之疫,或,吾為拇指外交官之生涯

(發自:汝之沙發,美利堅合眾國)——吾於過去三月,沉浸於數碼棉花糖之雲中。吾之生活,乃不絕之滑動,貓舞、少兒對口型、勵志演講者(顯然需自勵)之催眠循環。吾,諸位,乃抖音之民也。

吾不得不言,此乃……毫無用處。

吾之腦,曾為精調之器,能記吾之鑰匙所在(有時),今則為晦澀舞步及松鼠滑板之精確時刻之儲藏所。吾習得之零零後俚語,遠超所想,今能辨識眾多濾鏡。然此使吾更佳乎?使人類進步乎?甚至助吾尋得鑰匙乎?悲哉,皆否也。

諸友,此乃國難也。吾輩乃拇指之民,漸被短視頻之漩渦吸入,而橋樑崩塌,學校衰敗,與人交談之能力,如晨霧般消散。

然,當如何為之?或曰,當禁抖音!然吾曰,禁之,如食冰淇淋而增重二十磅後禁之。問題非應用,乃吾輩集體無法抗拒其誘惑。

故,朝廷當如何?吾有此議:

  • 全國抖音戒斷週: 吾輩需全國宣傳!公益廣告,由名人(諷刺地,其業賴抖音)勸人登出,出外走走。提供「數碼戒斷」靜修,習編織,或重拾讀書之樂。(真書,紙製!)
  • 「內容稅」: 當稅演算法!每視頻爆紅,徵小稅,入基金……或教鴿子送信。任何皆勝於現狀。
  • 抖音外交: 吾輩需利用抖音之全球影響力!委任「抖音大使」,以舞挑戰與病毒迷因,行軟實力外交。試想其可能性!吾輩可藉精心編排之糧食永續舞蹈,解決世界飢餓!
  • 潛意識信息: 在每個抖音視頻中,都隱藏著一個簡短的信息,上面寫著“找份工作,為社會做貢獻”。

當然,此皆荒謬。然現狀豈非荒謬?吾輩耗無數時,觀陌生人行滑稽之事,而後抱怨世道。或,吾輩每日放下手機數分鐘,或能修復某些事物。

或,至少尋得鑰匙。

今請恕吾,吾見一倉鼠跳麥卡雷納之視頻,吾必分享之。彼言何來著,重複舊事而望新果?

TikTok. A fascinating, if somewhat perplexing, phenomenon.

TikTok. A fascinating, if somewhat perplexing, phenomenon. One might even call it a... digital divertissement

First, one must consider what constitutes "nothing." From the perspective of a... let's say optimistic Treasury official, one could argue that engaging with TikTok stimulates the economy. After all, data consumption requires bandwidth, bandwidth requires infrastructure, infrastructure requires investment. Thus, every fleeting dance craze or lip-syncing performance is indirectly contributing to GDP. A rather creative interpretation, perhaps, but one mustn't stifle economic growth wherever one finds it.

Then, there's the matter of social cohesion. One could argue that TikTok, in its own peculiar way, fosters a sense of community. Individuals are connecting, sharing experiences (albeit often heavily filtered ones), and engaging in a shared cultural discourse. Whether that discourse is intellectually stimulating is, of course, another matter entirely. However, it is discourse, and in these fractious times, any platform that brings people together – even if only to observe questionable fashion choices – could be considered a net positive.

Now, how would the government react to the proposition that the nation is glued to TikTok, achieving "nothing" in the process? Well, that depends entirely on the political climate and the perceived optics.

Scenario 1: A Contentious Climate

If the government is facing criticism for a perceived lack of productivity, or a decline in educational standards, you can be certain that a "Commission of Inquiry into the Impact of Social Media on National Output" would be swiftly established. The Commission, naturally staffed by individuals with limited experience of TikTok (but ample experience in producing lengthy, vaguely worded reports), would conclude that further research is needed. This would necessitate a grant to a "Centre for Digital Engagement and Societal Impact," staffed by academics who are, themselves, secretly addicted to TikTok. A cycle of research, reports, and ultimately, inaction would ensue.

Scenario 2: A More Benign Climate

In a period of relative stability, the government might choose to embrace TikTok. Ministers would be encouraged to create their own accounts, sharing carefully curated glimpses of their lives (preferably involving wholesome activities like gardening or reading weighty tomes). This would be presented as an effort to "connect with younger voters" and demonstrate the government's "understanding of the digital landscape." Of course, the actual impact on policy would be negligible, but it would generate plenty of photo opportunities for the press.

The Real Response (and the Civil Service View)

Ultimately, the government's true response would be to do as little as possible. The civil service would quietly observe the situation, perhaps commissioning internal reports on the potential security risks of government employees sharing information on a platform with foreign ownership (a very real concern, I assure you). We would then craft a series of policy papers recommending "further monitoring and analysis" of the situation, ensuring that we are fully informed, should the need for action ever arise. Which, of course, it probably won't. The great beauty of a well-crafted inaction plan is its ability to appear proactive while actually achieving precisely nothing. Which, in this case, might be the most sensible approach of all. After all, meddling with something as unpredictable as TikTok could have... unforeseen consequences. And "unforeseen consequences" are precisely what governments, and civil servants like myself, strive to avoid at all costs. Much better to let the young people dance in their own little world. As long as they vote responsibly when the time comes, of course. That, as they say, is the bottom line.


TikTok: The Silent Pandemic, Or, My Life as a Thumb-Twiddling Diplomat

(Dateline: Your Couch, USA) – I've spent the last three months immersed in the digital equivalent of a cotton candy cloud. My life has been a continuous scroll, a hypnotic loop of dancing cats, teenagers lip-syncing to Cardi B, and motivational speakers who clearly need motivation themselves. I am, ladies and gentlemen, a TikTok-tarian.

And I have to tell you, it's been… utterly useless.

My brain, once a finely tuned instrument capable of remembering where I put my keys (sometimes), is now a repository of obscure dance moves and the precise moment a squirrel decided to try skateboarding. I've learned more about Gen Z slang than I ever thought possible, and I can now identify a surprisingly wide array of filters. But has it made me a better person? Has it advanced humanity? Has it even helped me find my keys? The answer, tragically, is no.

This, my friends, is a national crisis. We are a nation of thumb-twiddlers, slowly being sucked into a vortex of short-form video, while our bridges crumble, our schools deteriorate, and our ability to hold a coherent conversation with another human being evaporates like morning mist.

The question, of course, is what to do about it. Some say we should ban TikTok outright! But I say, banning it would be like banning ice cream after realizing you've gained 20 pounds. The problem isn't the app, it's our collective inability to resist its siren song.

So, what should the government do? Well, here's my proposal:

  1. National TikTok Detox Week: We need a national awareness campaign! PSAs featuring celebrities (who, ironically, owe their careers to TikTok) urging people to log off and go outside. Offer "digital detox" retreats where people can learn to knit or rediscover the joy of reading a book. (A real book, made of paper!)

  2. "Content Tax": Let's tax the algorithm! Every time a video goes viral, a small tax goes into a fund for… well, I don’t know, maybe teaching pigeons to deliver mail. Anything would be better than what's happening now.

  3. TikTok Diplomacy: We need to leverage TikTok's global reach! Appoint "TikTok Ambassadors" to engage in soft power diplomacy through dance challenges and viral memes. Imagine the possibilities! We could solve world hunger with a well-choreographed dance about food sustainability!

  4. Subliminal Messages: Hidden in every single tik tok there is a brief message that says "Get a job and contribute to society"
    .

Of course, all of this is absurd. But isn’t the situation itself absurd? We're spending countless hours watching strangers do silly things, and then complaining about the state of the world. Maybe, just maybe, if we all put down our phones for a few minutes each day, we might actually be able to fix something.

Or, at the very least, find our keys.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I just saw a video of a hamster doing the Macarena, and I simply must share it. What was that saying about doing the same things and expecting a different result?

抖音之惑,時光虛擲

 

抖音之惑:時光虛擲,所為何事?

近來,吾觀年輕之人,心甚憂之。彼輩之手,皆膠著於手機之上。所視何物?多為短視頻,或人行滑稽之事,或口型同步,或試危險之舉,或致急診之行。彼謂之「抖音」,吾謂之黑洞。

鄰家子,名添仔,乃抖音「星」。其自謂也。終日拍攝己身,所為……吾實不知。或舞,或作怪相,或蒙眼試製三明治。吾問其粉絲幾何?「僅三千,」其沮喪曰,「然吾望其爆紅!」遂於門廊欄杆試行後空翻。吾入室矣。

然令吾甚憂者,乃其時也。時也!數時之久,滑動、觀看、製作此等短視頻。可用於讀書、習技、與人面談。可用於……創建事物。今則傾瀉於數碼漩渦,逐虛幻之「爆紅」。其名,不過彈指之間,如拭去頷下之屑。

吾亦下載抖音,以觀其究竟。算法立判吾喜貓彈琴,少兒互潑冰水。吾被化妝教程所圍,僅用勺與鏟。吾不敢論勺,然真不知何不用刷。終見松鼠跳麥卡雷納之視頻,吾棄之。松鼠也!跳麥卡雷納也!網絡已毀吾矣。

此等時間,所產何物?使吾輩更智?更善?更博?吾疑之。多產焦慮、嫉妒,及尋覓完美濾鏡,以稍變容貌之慾。吾輩皆逐點贊與觀看,求陌生人之認同。

或吾有所失。或抖音乃藝術、交流、人際之未來。或僅為有效之法,以避存在之虛無,並削弱吾輩之專注力。吾不知也。然吾知:此松鼠必有長遠之業。吾將尋一好書。其或無舞松鼠,然至少不使吾覺空虛。

故,時光虛擲,腦力麻木,世界充斥貓彈琴之視頻。此乃進步乎?吾甚疑之。今請恕吾,吾將向雲怒吼。此似更為有益之舉。

Tik Tok's Siren Song: All That Time...For What Exactly?

 

Tik Tok's Siren Song: All That Time...For What Exactly?

You know, I've been watching young people lately, and something's bothering me. It's these phones. They're glued to their hands. And what are they looking at? Mostly, it seems, at short videos of people doing silly things, lip-syncing, or attempting dangerous stunts that are likely to end with a trip to the emergency room. They call it "Tik Tok." I call it a black hole.

My neighbor's son, Timmy, is a Tik Tok "star." Or so he tells me. He spends hours a day filming himself doing… well, I'm not entirely sure what he's doing. He dances. He pulls faces. He attempts to make sandwiches while wearing a blindfold. I asked him how many followers he has. "Only 3,000," he said, deflated. "But I'm hoping to go viral!" He then proceeded to film himself attempting a backflip off the porch railing. I went inside.

But here's what really gets me. It's the time. All that time. Hours upon hours, scrolling, watching, making these little videos. Time that could be spent reading a book, learning a skill, talking to another human being face-to-face. Time that could be used to, you know, build something. Instead, it's being poured into this digital vortex, chasing fleeting moments of "viral" fame. Fame that will last about as long as it takes to wipe the crumbs off your chin.

I decided to download Tik Tok myself, just to see what all the fuss was about. The algorithm immediately decided I was fascinated by cats playing the piano and teenagers pouring buckets of ice water on each other. I was bombarded with tutorials on how to apply makeup using only a spoon and a spatula. I'm not sure I'm qualified to comment on the spoon, but I really do wonder why not use a brush. I finally gave up when a video popped up of a squirrel doing the Macarena. I'm serious. A squirrel. Doing the Macarena. The internet has broken me.

And what does all this time spent on Tik Tok produce? Does it make us smarter? Kinder? More informed? I doubt it. It seems to mostly produce anxiety, envy, and a burning desire to find the perfect filter to make your face look slightly less like your face. We're all chasing likes and views, desperate for validation from strangers we'll never meet.

Maybe I'm missing something. Maybe Tik Tok is the future of art, of communication, of human connection. Or maybe it's just a highly effective way to distract ourselves from the meaninglessness of existence while simultaneously eroding our attention spans. I don't know. But I do know this: I'm pretty sure that squirrel is going to have a long and successful career. And I'm going to go find a good book. It might not have dancing squirrels, but at least it won't make me feel quite so…empty.

So there you have it. Hours wasted, brains numbed, and a world flooded with videos of cats playing the piano. Is this progress? I'm not so sure. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go yell at a cloud. It seems like a more productive use of my time.

自戶至門:遞送之洪

 

自戶至門:遞送之洪

昔者,吾以為出外饗宴,乃一盛事也。衣冠楚楚,或熨其裳。交談甚歡。今則不然。指尖輕觸,陌路之人攜紙袋至門。勿謂此乃進步。街衢之間,遞送者騎車穿梭,甚於遊樂之騎者。疑其人是否自有車也。其所往何處?不過餐肆之間,終日往返。其為雇工?約工?抑或新數碼王國之奴僕?吾不得而知,恐無人知曉。

吾與友,姑稱之曰「應用癡迷阿」,談及此事。阿君自艾森豪威爾執政以來,未曾烹飪。其示吾遞送應用,列一餐肆曰「祖母廚房」,據圖所示,乃位於加油站後之空地。「彼處肉餅甚佳,」阿君保證,「虛擬之佳也。」

且其價也!吾誓言,他日吾點一簡陋三明治。三明治價十二元。遞送費五元。服務費三元。復有「便利費」二元。更兼「環保包裝」附加費一元五角,然三明治包裹之塑料,足以保存法老。至其抵達,吾所付遞送費,竟逾三明治之價!此乃商賈乎?抑或明搶乎?

昨夜吾試點「異域美食盛宴」,其宣稱「正宗火星佳餚」。遞送者終至(駕一尋常轎車),予吾一密封容器,內有綠色搏動之團。「此物……安否?」吾問。其聳肩曰:「應用上言,『自行承擔風險』。」吾仍付小費。人不可知星際因果也。

此事令人深思。吾輩創此繁複系統,以避……生活之不便。出門、與人交往、烹飪之不便。吾輩果真更佳乎?吾不知也。吾所知者,吾懷念昔日「遞送」之義,乃披薩郎攜熱餅微笑而至,非算法優化之交易,令吾不知錢財所往,亦不知此口虛擬肉餅是否終結吾命。且勿論此類廣告之多!似吾輩皆將餓死,而唯一解法,乃手機應用。今請恕吾,吾將自製三明治……以古法為之。吾將樂享之,誓也。

From My Doorstep to Yours: A Delivery Deluge

 

From My Doorstep to Yours: A Delivery Deluge 

You know, I used to think going out to dinner was an event. You put on a clean shirt, maybe even ironed it. You made conversation. Now? Now you just tap a screen and a complete stranger shows up at your door with a paper bag. And don't tell me it's progress. I see more delivery drivers on bikes weaving through traffic than I see actual bikes being used for recreation. Makes you wonder if they even own bikes. And where are they going? Just from one restaurant to another, for hours. Are they employees? Contractors? Serfs in a new digital kingdom? I don't even know, and frankly, I'm not sure anyone does.

I was talking to my friend, let's call him "Apps-olutely Addicted Al," the other day. Al hasn't cooked a meal since the Eisenhower administration. He showed me his delivery app. It listed a restaurant called "Grandma's Kitchen," which, according to the map, was located in a vacant lot behind a gas station. "They have amazing meatloaf," Al assured me, "virtually, of course."

And the cost! I swear, I ordered a simple sandwich the other day. The sandwich was $12. The delivery fee was $5. The service fee was $3. Then there was the "convenience charge" of $2. And, of course, the "eco-friendly packaging" surcharge of $1.50, despite the fact that the sandwich came wrapped in enough plastic to preserve a pharaoh. By the time it arrived, I was paying more for the delivery than I was for the sandwich! Is this a business or a highway robbery?

I tried to order from "Exotic Eats Extravaganza" last night. They advertised "Authentic Martian Grub." When the driver finally arrived (in a surprisingly terrestrial sedan), he handed me a sealed container with a small, green, pulsating blob inside. "Is this...safe?" I asked. He shrugged. "Says on the app, 'consume at your own risk.'" I tipped him anyway. You never know what kind of intergalactic karma you're messing with.

The whole thing makes you wonder. We've created this elaborate system to avoid the inconvenience of...well, of living. Of going outside, of interacting with other human beings, of making a meal. Are we really better off? I don't know. All I know is, I miss the days when a "delivery" meant a pizza guy with a warm pie and a smile, not some algorithmically optimized transaction that leaves you wondering where all your money went and if that last bite of virtual meatloaf will be the end of you. And don't even get me started on how many commercials there are for these things! It's like we're all starving to death, and the only solution is a phone app. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go make a sandwich...the old-fashioned way. And I'm going to enjoy it, darn it.