2025年7月6日 星期日

Root Metaphors: How Plants Describe People and Their Hidden Meanings in Taiwan's Cultural Landscape

 

Root Metaphors: How Plants Describe People and Their Hidden Meanings in Taiwan's Cultural Landscape

The language we use to describe human identity and belonging is often rich with metaphors drawn from the natural world. Among the most evocative are those that liken people to plants, particularly their roots. In Taiwan, the sweet potato (hóngshǔ) serves as a poignant example, colloquially describing those who arrived on the island before 1949, implying a deep, indigenous connection to the land. This linguistic choice isn't arbitrary; it taps into profound anthropological and cultural meanings embedded in our understanding of roots.


The Sweet Potato and Taro in Taiwan: A Rooted and Transplanted Identity

In Taiwan, "sweet potato" (蕃薯) became a powerful symbol to distinguish early Hokkien and Hakka immigrants who settled the island. It implied a long-standing, organic relationship with the soil, a local authenticity. This symbolic association stems from the sweet potato's hardy, sprawling nature and its ability to thrive almost anywhere on the island, embodying the resilience and deep-seated connection of those who had put down roots generations ago.

The arrival of the Nationalist government in 1949, bringing with it a large number of mainland Chinese, predominantly soldiers, led to a new linguistic distinction. These newcomers, distinct from the local Taiwanese, were informally dubbed "taro" (芋仔). This choice was not random; "old taro" (老芋仔) became a natural counterpoint to the "sweet potato" due to the taro's similar underground growth, but perhaps also subtly hinting at a different kind of origin or less immediate "rootedness" compared to those who had been on the island for generations. Interestingly, many of these "mainlanders" had been diverse in their provincial origins before arriving in Taiwan, but once they crossed the strait, they were all collectively called "taro" by the locals.

This metaphor highlights a fundamental human need: to define who belongs and who doesn't, who is "from here" and who is "from away." The "roots" become a marker of nativeness, authenticity, and historical presence.


Why Roots? An Anthropological Perspective

From an anthropological viewpoint, the consistent use of root metaphors to describe human groupings isn't coincidental.

  • Anchoring and Stability: Roots are fundamental to a plant's survival, anchoring it firmly to the ground. This symbolizes stability, belonging, and an enduring presence in a particular place. To be "rooted" implies a deep, unshakeable connection that withstands the tests of time and change.

  • Origin and Ancestry: Roots are the origin point, drawing sustenance from the earth to nourish the entire plant. This naturally extends to metaphors of ancestry, heritage, and foundational identity. Our "roots" connect us to our forebears, our place of origin, and the cultural traditions passed down through generations. To speak of "uprooting" is to describe profound displacement, loss of identity, and severed connections.

  • Hidden Strength and Resilience: Much like the sweet potato or taro, roots often grow unseen beneath the surface, yet they are the source of the plant's strength and resilience. This hidden aspect mirrors the enduring, often unspoken bonds of community and shared history that define a group. It suggests a strength that isn't always visible but is vital for survival, especially in challenging times.

  • Organic Growth and Adaptation: Plants adapt to their environment through their roots, finding nutrients even in difficult conditions. This adaptability can be mirrored in how immigrant groups, over generations, become deeply integrated into a new land, developing unique cultural forms that are both new and rooted in their new environment.


The Integration of "Sweet Potatoes" and "Taro": The Emergence of "Sweetaro"

The story of "sweet potatoes" and "taro" in Taiwan isn't just about distinction; it's also about integration. The subsequent generation, born from intermarriages between "mainlanders" and "locals," humorously earned the nickname "sweetaro" (蕃芋). This blended term itself signifies a new, evolving identity that transcends the initial rigid categories.

These terms, "sweet potato" and "taro," despite lacking formal academic definitions, became widely accepted vernaculars. They also fostered intriguing, albeit sometimes stereotypical, perceptions: "sweet potatoes" were rumored to be traditional, perhaps even practiced "ninjutsu" due to Taiwan's historical Japanese colonial rule, while "taro" were thought to love garlic, chili, dog meat, and to spoil their wives, despite having notoriously bad tempers. These stereotypes, whether accurate or not, illustrate the human tendency to categorize and simplify complex group dynamics.

Yet, over forty years, "sweet potatoes" and "taro" coexisted, and many formed "sweetaro" families. They gradually discovered that stereotypes didn't always hold true: not all "taro" loved chili, and the "ninjutsu" idea was laughable. Just as not all mainlanders were KMT members, nor all Taiwanese voted for the DPP.

Take, for example, a "sweetaro" couple where the husband is from Hebei and the wife is a Hakka from Miaoli. Their deep affection for each other exists despite stark differences in past experiences. The wife, educated under Japanese rule, loves Japanese customs and songs, longing to visit Japan. The husband, having served in the underground during the Anti-Japanese War and bearing fire scars from Japanese soldiers, despises everything Japanese. When she hums a Japanese tune, he can't help but sing loudly the "Big Sword Song" or "The Trilogy of the Exiles" in defiance. Yet, they understand the unspoken rule: "Singing is singing, family is family." They might disagree on songs, but they haven't fought over it in decades of marriage. Their "sweetaro" household embraces a fusion of eating habits: Taiwanese-style plain porridge and side dishes, complemented by large mainland-style steamed buns. This "sweetaro" family thrives in this seemingly contradictory yet integrated manner.


Marriage and the Evolution of Identity: A New Root System

In the traditional mainland Chinese society, fifty li was considered "another land." Many mainlanders who retreated to Taiwan in 1949 could never have imagined this island's existence. Approximately 910,000 military personnel and civilians, constituting 14% of Taiwan's population at the time, arrived between 1948 and 1950. Most harbored dreams of returning home. As days turned into years, their homeland seemed more distant, forcing them to make new plans, often marrying locals with the hope of taking their families back someday.

The nature of this military and political migration led to a severe gender imbalance, with roughly three men for every woman. This disparity, coupled with initial cultural and linguistic barriers, made it difficult for first-generation mainlanders to marry within their own diverse "mainlander" group. Many thus turned to marrying local Taiwanese. The early post-Restoration period saw significant tensions, including the infamous February 28 Incident of 1947. First-generation "sweetaro" marriages were often challenging due to these cultural and psychological gaps, leading to unhappiness in many cases.

Early on, mainlanders created their own enclaves in military dependents' villages. As Taiwanese wives gradually entered these communities, they became the largest base for ethnic integration. The "buying" of wives, often involving financially disadvantaged mainland veterans marrying marginalized local women (widows, disabled individuals, or Indigenous people), was a tragic reality, frequently leading to wives leaving or children suffering psychological distress due to a lack of emotional foundation.

While many first-generation intermarriages were driven by circumstances, some were rooted in genuine affection. Despite societal disapproval and obstacles, these unions often found a sweeter outcome. For instance, the marriage of Xiong Shuhua's father, a Hubei native, and her mother, a Hakka from Pingxi, was the first cross-provincial marriage in Pingxi. To avoid gossip, the groom even enlisted the local police chief to propose. The success of such unions even led to a saying that "mainlanders spoil their wives," sparking a trend of local women wanting to marry mainlanders.


The Blurring of Lines: New Ancestries, New Loyalties

Forty years later, when "mainlanders" revisited their ancestral homes, they often found themselves viewed as distinct "outsiders" by their own kin, having adapted to Taiwanese life.

Studies from Academia Sinica show that intermarriage rates between locals and mainlanders hovered around 16% to 19% since 1944. Initially, there was a clear imbalance in first-generation marriages: 1.5% were Hokkien men marrying mainlander women, while 7.4% were mainlander men marrying Hokkien women, highlighting the market pressure on mainlander men. By the second generation, the percentages became much closer (5.3% for local men/mainlander women; 5.2% for local women/mainlander men), indicating reduced structural pressure and greater potential for genuine ethnic integration.

While first-generation unions often resulted from circumstance, second-generation relationships were more likely based on emotion. However, differing backgrounds still presented challenges when interacting with the older generation.

The "sweetaro" families often became bilingual. Children of these unions frequently possessed language advantages, speaking both Mandarin and Hokkien fluently, and some even English. This linguistic versatility proved beneficial in navigating Taiwan's diverse social landscape. Moreover, research indicates that the "provincial consciousness" of "sweetaro" children tends to be lower than that of children from ethnically homogenous families, supporting the theory that intermarriage promotes ethnic integration.

Yet, as provincial identities become more politicized, the "sweetaro" generation often feels caught in the middle. They resist being labeled, expressing frustration at being forced to "choose sides" between their parents' origins. Their "homesickness" can also differ markedly from their parents'. For example, someone whose father spoke of a beautiful mainland homeland might, after growing up in Taiwan and traveling globally, find themselves missing Taipei's streets more than a distant "homeland" they've never truly known.


The Fusion of Flavors: Taiwan's Unique "Sweetaro" Culture

Taiwan today has become a unique melting pot of diverse Chinese regional characteristics, yet it has forged a distinct local flavor. While Sichuan restaurants abound, the food here is less intensely spicy than in authentic Sichuan cuisine. Taiwanese have adapted to a milder spice level, and even Sichuanese residents in Taiwan have adjusted their palates. Food habits have blended, and so have the people.

One elderly veteran, upon returning to his mainland hometown after decades in Taiwan, recounted feeling like an "outsider" again, having grown accustomed to Taiwanese life. Similarly, Mrs. Fang Yu, wife of former Premier Lien Chan, born in Chongqing, stated that despite being a mainlander, she doesn't miss the current mainland and prefers Taiwan, where she has lived for decades, seeing herself as a Chinese person in Taiwan.

Professor Liao Zhongshan, from Henan, arrived in Taiwan at 15 with the military and still struggles with fluent Hokkien. His marriage to his wife, Lin Lichai from Kaohsiung, was born not of grand romance but circumstance. As an orphan, his wife sought a mainlander without family burdens, while he, alone in Taiwan, needed a wife. Despite their differing backgrounds and culinary preferences—she loving pig intestine noodles, he preferring large steamed buns—their bond is strong, rooted in a shared love for the land. As Liao puts it, "Given enough time, a foreign land becomes home." He views China as his "birth mother" and Taiwan as his "adoptive mother," declaring himself a "Taiwanese person" after forty years.

Do you realize? While Taiwanese affectionately call themselves "sweet potatoes" and mainlanders "taro," neither plant is indigenous to Taiwan. Yet, both have thrived on this land, becoming common sights. Just like these plants, over time, "taro" transforms into "sweet potato," and "sweet potato" increasingly resembles "taro." And what of the "sweetaro" offspring? As one "sweetaro" parent sighed, observing their children's preference for American fast food, "Alas! How did sweet potatoes and taro give birth to potatoes?!" In today's Taiwan, perhaps there are no longer "sweet potatoes" or "taro," only "potatoes."


根的隱喻:植物如何描述人群及其深層的文化人類學意涵

 

根的隱喻:植物如何描述人群及其深層的文化人類學意涵

我們用來描述人類身份和歸屬感的語言,往往充滿了來自大自然的隱喻。其中,將人比作植物,尤其是它們的,是最具啟發性的比喻之一。在台灣,番薯(Sweet Potato)就是一個恰如其分的例子,它被口語化地用來形容在1949年之前抵達台灣的人們,暗示著一種與土地深厚的、原生的連結。這種語言選擇並非隨意,它觸及了我們對根的理解中,所蘊含的深刻人類學和文化意義。


台灣的番薯:一種根深蒂固的身份認同

在台灣,「番薯」成為了一個強而有力的符號,用以區分早期來台定居的閩南人和客家人,與有時被用來指稱1949年後抵台的中國大陸移民的「芋仔」。番薯憑藉其堅韌、蔓延的特性,以及幾乎可以在島上任何地方生長的特點,象徵著那些數代以來在此落地生根的人們的韌性和與土地的深厚連結。它暗示著一種與土壤長期而有機的關係,一種地方的真實性。

這個隱喻突顯了一種基本的人類需求:定義誰屬於這裡,誰不屬於這裡;誰是「本地人」,誰是「外來者」。而「根」則成為了本土性、真實性和歷史存在的標誌。


為何是根?人類學視角

從人類學的角度來看,持續使用根的隱喻來描述人群並非巧合。

  • 錨定與穩定: 根是植物生存的基礎,將其牢牢固定在土壤中。這象徵著在特定地方的穩定、歸屬和持久的存在。「根深蒂固」意味著一種堅不可摧的連結,經得起時間和變化的考驗。

  • 起源與祖先: 根是起源點,從大地中汲取養分以滋養整株植物。這自然延伸到祖先、遺產和基礎身份的隱喻。我們的「根」將我們與祖先、原籍地以及世代相傳的文化傳統聯繫起來。談論「連根拔起」則是在描述深刻的流離失所、身份喪失和連結斷裂。

  • 隱藏的力量與韌性: 就像番薯或木薯一樣,根通常在地下看不見的地方生長,但它們卻是植物力量和韌性的來源。這種隱藏的面向反映了定義一個群體的持久而往往無聲的社區紐帶和共同歷史。它暗示著一種不總是可見但對生存至關重要的力量,尤其是在充滿挑戰的時期。

  • 有機生長與適應: 植物透過其根部適應環境,即使在困難的條件下也能找到養分。這種適應性可以反映在移民群體如何經過數代人,深深融入新的土地,發展出既新穎又根植於新環境的獨特文化形式。


全球共鳴:其他植物比喻人

台灣的番薯隱喻僅是全球現象的一個例子。世界各地的文化都有類似的比較:

  • 「本地人」(Native sons/daughters):這個常用短語喚起了某人在某地出生長大的概念,從其「土壤」中汲取生命。

  • 「家族樹」(Family tree):這或許是最廣泛的根部隱喻,以視覺方式呈現血統和祖先連結。

  • 「草根運動」(Grassroots movements):指源於社會最基層的社會或政治行動,暗示著一種有機的、廣泛的基礎。

  • 「Stammbaum」(德語,意為「部落/血統之樹」):用於表示家族樹,強調深厚的歷史根源。

  • 在一些原住民文化中,特定的植物或樹木被視為直系祖先或精神親屬,進一步模糊了人類身份與自然世界之間的界線。這通常反映了一種整體世界觀,即人類是生態系統不可或缺的一部分,而非獨立於其外。


隱藏的意義:包容、排斥與歸屬

在描述人群時使用根的隱喻,往往帶有與包容和排斥相關的隱藏意義。儘管它們可以培養被視為「根深蒂固」者之間的共同身份和歸屬感,但它們也可能微妙地或公然地排斥他人。

  • 當一個群體將自己定義為「根植於」一片土地(如台灣的番薯)時,它會潛在地將其他人歸類為「無根」或「根基較淺」者。這可能導致社會階層、關於真實性的爭論,以及對權利和資源的政治鬥爭

  • 一個人的根有多「深」,可能成為衡量其合法性的標準,潛在地暗示誰更有權利主張某個地方。這在具有複雜移民和定居歷史的社會中是一個常見的主題。

  • 然而,這些隱喻也道出了人類對連結、歸屬感和地方感的普遍渴望。我們都尋求找到自己的「根」,無論是字面上的故鄉,還是在一個能讓我們安身立命的社群中找到精神上的歸屬。

因此,台灣不起眼的番薯,就像世界各地無數其他植物隱喻一樣,為人類如何看待自己的起源、與土地的連結,以及身份和歸屬感之間錯綜複雜的動態,提供了一扇窗。這些語言選擇絕非膚淺,它們深深植根於我們對自身是誰以及來自何方的集體理解之中。