2025年6月2日 星期一

How Yongkun's Gold Scheme Operated Like a Ponzi

 


The Unspoken Divide: How Yongkun's Gold Scheme Operated Like a Ponzi

The story of Yongkun Mall's collapse is a textbook example of a Ponzi scheme, meticulously executed and disguised over a decade. It ensnared over 10,000 victims, siphoning off an estimated 2 to 5 billion RMB, predominantly from wealthy individuals in Zhejiang province – the very people who had accumulated significant assets through economic booms and property demolitions. Many of these victims, including Yongkun's own employees, lost their entire life savings.

Here's how this elaborate "golden cicada shedding its shell" operation unfolded:

The Deceptive Foundations (First 3 Years: Building Trust with "Real Gold")

Yongkun understood the power of trust. In its initial phase, it acted as a legitimate gold trading platform. Customers who bought investment gold could withdraw physical gold upon maturity, and the promised 9% annual returns arrived promptly. This appeared far more lucrative than traditional bank deposits. To bolster this façade, the company invested heavily in superficial displays: genuine gold in showrooms, but the "warehouses" were filled with brass, and bank gold reserves were mere photoshopped images. This convinced shrewd Zhejiang business owners and demolition beneficiaries that they had stumbled upon a hidden gem, leading to rapid word-of-mouth expansion.

The Snowballing Illusion (Middle 4 Years: Robbing Peter to Pay Paul)

As Yongkun's reputation spread, new investor capital became the primary source for paying off older clients' interest. For instance, with 1 billion RMB in principal, a 9% annual interest payout would require 90 million RMB. However, the actual market volatility of gold during those years only offered a maximum return of 150 million RMB, leaving a deficit of 75 million RMB. This shortfall was covered by a multi-level marketing (MLM) recruitment model. Promising a staggering 29% commission for developing new "downlines" (meaning 290,000 RMB for every 1 million RMB invested by a recruit), Yongkun incentivized its staff and even local community members to pull in their relatives and neighbors. This viral recruitment fueled the Ponzi structure, with even company employees succumbing to the allure, investing their entire savings and borrowed money.

The Evasive Endgame (Final 3 Years: Delay Tactics and Covert Transfers)

In the last three years, as gold prices surged (reaching 767 RMB/gram in 2025 from an earlier 560 RMB/gram, implying massive promised payouts), Yongkun began its exit strategy. While investors were due substantial gains, the funds had already been moved. The company employed various delay tactics to string investors along:

  • Debt-to-Points Conversion: Offering virtual points that could supposedly be redeemed for gold, but in reality, only allowed exchange for copper-plated iron pieces.
  • "Lock-up" Threats: Scaring investors with high withdrawal fees, urging them to keep their money in to "earn more."
  • Fake System Upgrades: The mobile app would conveniently undergo "maintenance," disabling withdrawal functions.

Simultaneously, a sophisticated money laundering operation was underway. Funds were transferred to hundreds of shell companies spanning jewelry, e-commerce, and supply chain businesses. Franchisees' daily revenues were forcibly collected and diverted to cover interest payments, while executives secured overseas properties and created fabricated gold insurance policies (one claiming 4.1 billion RMB in value with only 4,000 RMB paid in premiums).

The inevitable collapse finally occurred, with Yongkun's boss, Wang Guohai, reportedly escaping to the U.S. on a private jet, his timing impeccable.

The Unseen Cost: A Lesson in Preserving Wealth

The most poignant aspect of this decade-long "pig butchering" scam is the sheer scale of personal devastation. One three-generation Zhejiang family, for instance, lost 20 million RMB – the accumulated wealth of a lineage that included a wartime codebreaker, 1960s university graduates, top-tier doctors, and Fortune 500 executives. Three generations of hard-earned assets vanished at the hands of a single scammer.

This tragedy underscores a profound lesson: preserving wealth is an even more profound wisdom than accumulating it. Many successful individuals, whether self-employed bosses, demolition beneficiaries, or hardworking people with savings, often shy away from simply depositing money in banks for modest returns. Instead, they seek higher returns through entrepreneurship, investment, or even gambling – a desire for accelerated wealth that can make them vulnerable to schemes like Yongkun's. The story highlights how even well-intentioned individuals seeking to grow their wealth can, by placing "all their eggs in one basket" and chasing unrealistic returns, unwittingly expose themselves to catastrophic losses.

智與慧:稅負之辨

 智與慧:稅負之辨

夫世人好以智識學業論才,然「智」(即聰明,能創新解難者)與「慧」(即智慧,能觀局識變,優化終局者)常混為一。特就財賦之道,析此異同,以察人智之妙。


一、智與慧兼備者:高入而稅輕

此乃財智雙絕之士。其人智足以致高俸,慧足以固財源,善守其富。或為賈者,深諳稅則利弊,巧用策略;或為士人,憑謀士良言,優化資產。其聰明令其富甲一方,其智慧使財不虛耗,乃智、慧合璧之象也。


二、智高而慧淺者:高入而稅重

此類人者,惑人反常。其學業精湛,才華洋溢,收入豐厚,毋庸置疑為英才。然不善理財,任巨額錢財,徑入府庫,而不知善用稅律。譬若良醫巨律,心專術業,無暇顧及私財;或高管顯要,獨重功績,怠於財計。其智足以聚財,然慧不足以守財,故常負重稅,甚可惋惜。


三、學淺而慧深者:入微而稅輕

此類人者,異於俗見。其人或非學有所成,或無顯赫之職,所得或寡。然深具務實之市井智慧,善察稅法,盡用其利。其人勤儉儲蓄,量入為出,善理薄產。如匠人自營,細計開銷;或長者持家,善理資產。其不假外物,全憑己慧,使微薄之財,亦能保全。


四、智慧俱失者:入微而稅重

此類人者,眾生之常也。其人常困於生計,所得寡薄,復不諳財稅,致稅負沉重。或為庸碌之輩,或陷於貧困之境,掙扎求存,難顧遠慮,亦無力善用稅制之利。其人所得既微,復無慧以自救,故常為重稅所困。


結語:智慧無定,財道有常

夫此論非在臧否人物,乃欲明智之多面也。「智」足以興業,而「慧」則可安身。善賺固要,然善守善增,乃真慧之所在,世人每易忽之。願天下人皆能明此理,善理財資,以圖長久。此不僅關乎富貴,亦關乎安樂也。

Are You Clever, Smart, or Just Paying Too Much Tax?

 

The Unspoken Divide: Are You Clever, Smart, or Just Paying Too Much Tax?

In a world obsessed with IQ scores, academic accolades, and career achievements, we often conflate various forms of intelligence. But what if "clever" — the ability to innovate, solve complex problems, and excel in traditional metrics — doesn't always translate to "smart" — the wisdom to navigate systems, optimize outcomes, and secure one's long-term well-being? This distinction becomes particularly stark when we examine financial acumen, especially concerning income and taxation.

Let's dissect this fascinating spectrum, using income tax as our provocative lens.


1. The Apex: Clever and Smart (High Income, Low Tax)

This is the pinnacle of financial astuteness. These individuals possess both the intellectual prowess to command high incomes and the strategic wisdom to retain a significant portion of their earnings. They are the highly successful entrepreneurs who understand business structures, tax incentives, and reinvestment strategies; the top-tier professionals who engage expert financial advisors to optimize their portfolios and deductions; or savvy investors who meticulously plan their asset allocation for tax efficiency.

Who they are: The venture capitalist structuring their investments through tax-advantaged vehicles, the international consultant leveraging dual residency laws, or the tech CEO who pays meticulous attention to their company's (and personal) financial architecture.

Why they are both: Their cleverness allows them to generate immense wealth, while their smartness ensures that wealth works for them, minimizing leakage to taxes through legitimate, well-planned strategies. They see the tax code not as a burden, but as a complex system to be understood and optimized.


2. The Contradiction: Clever But Not Smart (High Income, High Tax)

This group represents a perplexing paradox. They are undeniably brilliant, often at the zenith of their respective fields, earning substantial incomes. Yet, a significant portion of their hard-earned money flows directly into the tax coffers without much resistance. They might be highly skilled doctors, lawyers, senior corporate executives, or renowned academics. Their focus is almost exclusively on their craft, often neglecting personal financial literacy or strategic tax planning.

Who they are: The neurosurgeon making a seven-figure salary but relying solely on standard payroll deductions, the celebrated attorney too busy with client cases to delve into personal wealth management, or the top research scientist who maximises their pension contributions but overlooks other tax-efficient investment avenues.

Why they are clever but not smart: Their "cleverness" drives their high earning potential. However, their "not-smart" aspect lies in their disengagement from financial strategy. They may consider it too complex, boring, or simply a necessary evil. They often pay the highest effective tax rates because they don't leverage the legal mechanisms available to reduce their burden, effectively leaving money on the table.


3. The Understated Genius: Not Clever, But Smart (Low Income, Low Tax)

This category challenges conventional notions of intelligence. These individuals may not have excelled academically, may not hold prestigious titles, or command high incomes. Yet, they possess a profound, pragmatic "street smarts" when it comes to money. They are master navigators of the tax system for their income bracket, adept at claiming every available credit and deduction. They live frugally, prioritize savings, and understand simple, effective ways to protect their limited assets from undue taxation.1

Who they are: The self-employed artisan who meticulously tracks expenses and claims every business deduction, the single parent who expertly navigates government benefits and tax credits, or the retiree living simply but wisely investing in tax-free savings accounts and understanding inheritance laws.

Why they are not clever but smart: Their lack of traditional "cleverness" doesn't impede their financial wisdom. They understand the system at their level, make shrewd choices within their means, and prioritize financial resilience. They are often highly resourceful and pragmatic, turning every available financial lever to their advantage, ensuring what little they earn or possess is retained efficiently.


4. The Majority: Not Clever, Not Smart (Low Income, High Tax)

This group sadly represents a significant portion of the population. They often struggle with low incomes and, due to a lack of financial literacy, strategic foresight, or simply limited opportunities, bear a disproportionately high tax burden relative to their earnings. They may not understand how to claim basic deductions, are vulnerable to predatory lending, or live paycheck to paycheck with no buffer against financial shocks.

Who they are: The hourly wage earner who rarely reviews their tax filings, the individual trapped in cycles of high-interest debt, or those whose primary focus is simply survival, leaving little room for financial planning or optimization.

Why they are neither clever nor smart: Their circumstances often limit their earning potential, and a lack of financial education or guidance prevents them from navigating the tax system effectively. They are on a financial treadmill, where the struggle for basic needs overshadows any opportunity for strategic planning, leaving them with little income and few avenues to reduce their tax exposure.


Beyond the Labels: A Call for Financial Wisdom

This exploration isn't about judgment, but about recognizing the multifaceted nature of intelligence. Being "clever" is invaluable for innovation and societal progress. But being "smart" – especially financially smart – is critical for personal well-being and security.

The high-income individual paying high taxes isn't necessarily "bad," but they are missing an opportunity to optimize their wealth for greater impact or personal legacy. The low-income individual escaping most taxes isn't necessarily a genius, but their pragmatic wisdom deserves recognition.

Ultimately, this analysis highlights the urgent need for greater financial literacy and accessibility of strategic financial advice across all income levels. Understanding how to earn is crucial, but understanding how to retain and grow that earning, wisely and legally, is a distinct and often overlooked form of true intelligence.